Teams

Pace’s Double Shots AH

2025 40 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 3.5 W Thursday

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-13vs FOR FireballsLost 23
L#1 DoublesKaren Pozza / Mary Cirilo vs Kerry Napper / Susan Daum5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBertie Mzyk vs Amy Hall2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Stetson / Joan Sixkiller vs Sheila Gentry / Tracie Costello6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Trench / Marina Henkes vs Melissa Wilson / Deana Wilson4-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesSusan Townsend / Yvette Schleiger vs Deborah Kirker / Mallory Breen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
SANDRA TEETER
published
3.45
Donna Talley
published
3.40
Marina Henkes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Yvette Schleiger
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Elizabeth Fleming
published
3.25
Joan Sixkiller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Mary Cirilo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Heather Stetson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Bertie Mzyk
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.12
Karen Pozza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Jean Pace
published
2.70
Maria Trench
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Dilling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Pozza + Marina Henkes4255% games+9.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Fleming + Heather Stetson3252% games+8.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Fleming + Mary Cirilo6553% games+4.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Fleming + Marina Henkes4254% games+3.5% vs expected
Jean Pace + Mary Cirilo1640% games−0.0% vs expected
Karen Pozza + Yvette Schleiger2348% games−0.7% vs expected
Mary Cirilo + Marina Henkes2546% games−2.7% vs expected
Joan Sixkiller + Heather Stetson4345% games−8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

SANDRA TEETER
41W–35L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Donna Talley
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Marina Henkes
34W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Yvette Schleiger
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Elizabeth Fleming
26W–31L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Joan Sixkiller
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Mary Cirilo
24W–81L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Heather Stetson
24W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Bertie Mzyk
18W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Karen Pozza
16W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jean Pace
3W–19L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.06
3
Annette Armstrong
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Maria Trench
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Dilling
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.