Teams

LTFC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs KC-CC BLACKWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnasa Shank / Christine Paulsson vs Elizabeth Low / Carolyn Souk6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErica Bruenton / Christine Mavraganis vs Meghan Estrada / Cathy Welch6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTrish Casson / Emily Main Ballard vs Lesley Denning / Kathleen Schuster6-3, 6-0
2024-05-23vs GAC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCeline Ormond / Rene Concialdi vs Cortni Ward / Madeline Luttrell3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Babington / Christine Paulsson vs Tracey Sica / Karissa Savage6-1, 7-6
L#2 SinglesErin Wade vs Rebecca Handley3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesErica Bruenton / Christine Mavraganis vs Wendy Liu / Cassandra Buckner7-6, 6-3
2024-05-16vs SS-H GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesCeline Ormond / Brooke Babington vs Robin Triplett / Marcy Butler6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKaren Ruwe / Trish Casson vs Kim Belitz / Beatriz Bonnet6-4, 7-6
2024-05-09vs KC-CC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Brooke Babington vs Marjie Tokarski / Marnie Desmarteau6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnasa Shank / Erin Wade vs Kayley Green / Jennifer Gonyea4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCeline Ormond / Rene Concialdi vs Lori Thorp / Kim Rachwalski6-1, 6-0
2024-05-02vs HW BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Brooke Babington vs Kathy Norford / Karla Davies6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCeline Ormond / Anasa Shank vs Corby McGrath / Jennifer Marlowe4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmily Main Ballard / Karen Ruwe vs Stephanie Luther / Leslie Cutter2-6, 3-6
2024-04-25vs HV ORANGEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnasa Shank / Erin Wade vs Ashley Festoso / Leisha Andersen6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTrish Casson / Rene Concialdi vs Kris LaValley / Amy Dawson7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesEmily Main Ballard vs Angela Martorella1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Mavraganis / Karen Ruwe vs Mim Lyles / Heather Mantel6-3, 6-2
2024-04-18vs HFII GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesBrooke Babington / Christine Paulsson vs Janice Bull / Gloria Clark6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesErin Wade vs Michelle Windemuller6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTrish Casson / Emily Main Ballard vs Ann Hugh / Jeana Marks6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesErica Bruenton vs Sally Panis3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Celine Ormond
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Christine Paulsson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.65
Rene Concialdi
published
3.59
Anasa Shank
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Brooke Babington
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Erin Wade
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Robyn Moore
published
3.32
Naomi Fisher
published
3.28
Trish Casson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Shivani Sharma
published
3.23
Erica Bruenton
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Emily Main Ballard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Karen Ruwe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Paulsson + Brooke Babington10261% games+12.0% vs expected
Erin Wade + Rene Concialdi4166% games+8.5% vs expected
Christine Paulsson + Anasa Shank4552% games+2.5% vs expected
Erin Wade + Anasa Shank121051% games+2.2% vs expected
Robyn Moore + Trish Casson7757% games−0.8% vs expected
Christine Paulsson + Trish Casson8157% games−3.4% vs expected
Celine Ormond + Christine Paulsson61050% games−6.3% vs expected
Erin Wade + Celine Ormond6076% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celine Ormond
77W–41L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Christine Paulsson
113W–87L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Rene Concialdi
28W–16L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.65
4
Anasa Shank
100W–51L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Brooke Babington
53W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.58
3.5
Erin Wade
101W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Robyn Moore
23W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Naomi Fisher
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Trish Casson
74W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Shivani Sharma
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Erica Bruenton
40W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Emily Main Ballard
66W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Karen Ruwe
125W–144L career · 3 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.