Teams

Rowley

2023 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2022- HSV · 3.0 WOMEN 40N1S3D

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN 40N1S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Pamela Crook
published
2.97
Rebecca Cappetta
published
2.85
Monique Haselden
published
2.83
Vanessa Moorman
published
2.56
Sabrina Hammond
published
2.50
Brenda Witten
published 2.5
2.48
Terri Good
published
2.44
Elaine Hebert
published
2.41
Tina Yragui
published
2.20
Cindy Perry
published 2.5
2.20
Tammy Robertson
published
Elizabeth McIlwain
published
Judy Darwin
published
Paige Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Moorman + Monique Haselden91052% games+2.4% vs expected
Judy Darwin + Sabrina Hammond1437% games−9.7% vs expected
Cindy Perry + Elaine Hebert044 matchesnot enough data
Tina Yragui + Sabrina Hammond123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Crook
11W–55L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Rebecca Cappetta
25W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.97
Monique Haselden
42W–47L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
Vanessa Moorman
35W–50L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
2.83
Sabrina Hammond
14W–36L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Brenda Witten
13W–35L career · no lines in 2023
0%51%49%
2.50
Terri Good
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.48
Elaine Hebert
1W–32L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
Tina Yragui
33W–59L career · no lines in 2023
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Cindy Perry
23W–60L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.20
Tammy Robertson
4W–23L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.20
Elizabeth McIlwain
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Judy Darwin
4W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paige Wilson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.