Teams

Plantation Dipierro

2024 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 8.0 W Thursday

15 players · average NTRP 4.05 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-03-29vs Cedars Island Girls 8.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Marjorie Petruccelli vs Yuka Pearl / Kristin Knous7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Kerry Distefano vs Michelle Coates / Vickie Miller7-6, 7-5
2024-03-21vs Payne Park PerhaesWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Kerry Distefano vs Jacqueline Colon / Hong Li6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanet Kramer / Ana Areosa vs Laura Mouat / Jet Sagalow6-1, 6-1
2024-03-14vs LWR SosaWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Kerry Distefano vs Donna Dubinsky / Kathy Rain6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAna Areosa / Marjorie Petruccelli vs Jane Doe / Hayley Englander6-2, 6-2
2024-03-07vs LWN GillisLost 02
L#1 DoublesConnie Weiss / Ana Areosa vs Mary Gill / Cindy Markowitz6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClaudia Schmidt / Karen Chandler vs Meredith Poppler / Sherry Chase3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-02-29vs Esplanade HennessyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Kerry Distefano vs Leslie Miller / Kerrie Kennedy6-2, 6-0
2024-02-22vs LBK Public SchonhoffWon 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Distefano / Cynthia Horton vs Audra Ramsey / Rhonda Snow6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-15vs Mission Valley GibbsWon 10
W#3 DoublesCynthia Horton / Audrey Cohn vs Katie Magill / CHIEKO OHRSTROM6-0, 6-1
2024-02-08vs Sarasota/Seider/55&Over8.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Crews / Marjorie Petruccelli vs Cindy Wilson-Snyder / Dorene Seider6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Laura Peters / Marianne Kaplan5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-02-01vs LWR ZeiglerWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Kerry Distefano vs Karen Nicholson / Victoria Reid6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Marcia Frost / Betty Jo Zeigler6-3, 6-2
2024-01-18vs SSC DavySplit 11
W#1 DoublesAna Areosa / Marjorie Petruccelli vs Marsha Timm / Sheila Engert6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Maria Riccio vs Michele Rose / Roberta Smith2-6, 4-6
2024-01-11vs River Strand QuirosWon 20
W#1 DoublesKerry Distefano / Diane DeGurian vs Penny Franklin / Sharyn Quiros6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesClaudia Schmidt / Ellen Lori Smith MD vs Lynn Bucknam / Christie Stephenson6-2, 6-4
2024-01-04vs Waterford DuncanWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Crews / Marjorie Petruccelli vs Barbara Belanger / Mitzi Lamy6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Kerry Distefano vs SueAnn Sanders / Carla Rodman6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAna Areosa / Connie Weiss vs Constance Duncan / Lorraine K McBride6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Diane DeGurian
published 4.5
4.09
Marjorie Petruccelli
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.90
Ana Areosa
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.79
Diane Crews
published 4
3.72
Claudia Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Audrey Cohn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Connie Weiss
published 4
3.62
Cynthia Horton
published 4
3.47
Lesli Andrews
published
3.40
Yvonne Walker
published 3.5
Janet Kramer
published
Kerry Distefano
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Maria Riccio
published
Nora Saxe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marjorie Petruccelli + Diane DeGurian5455% games+6.4% vs expected
Ana Areosa + Marjorie Petruccelli8555% games−1.8% vs expected
Ana Areosa + Kerry Distefano1642% gamesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Janet Kramer314 matchesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Connie Weiss224 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Distefano + Marjorie Petruccelli224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane DeGurian
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Marjorie Petruccelli
85W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Ana Areosa
141W–119L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Ellen Lori Smith MD
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Claudia Schmidt
34W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Audrey Cohn
146W–120L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Connie Weiss
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Cynthia Horton
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
Lesli Andrews
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Yvonne Walker
136W–87L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.40
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kerry Distefano
39W–32L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Riccio
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nora Saxe
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.