Teams

Holds for Summer

Late and Hold Registrations · Summer

16 players · average NTRP 3.71 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Holds for Summer000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
3.97
Stacey Tomczak
published 4
3.94
Kristin Lueken
published
3.89
Beth Guske
published 4
3.35
Tricia Dziabis
published
3.26
Jessica Vahey
published
Dragisa Kupresak
published 3.5
3.21
Yvonne Davis
published
3.05
Plamen Pandev
published
2.85
Dina DeLaurentis
published 3
2.73
Sharon Martinez
published 3
Mark MacDonald
published
Michele Motta
published
Nico Gibson
published
Thomas Gilbertson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yvonne Davis + Sharon Martinez044 matchesnot enough data
Michele Motta + Jessica Vahey123 matchesnot enough data
Dina DeLaurentis + Jessica Vahey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allan Rangsithienchai
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.13
4
Stacey Tomczak
46W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.97
Kristin Lueken
43W–38L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Anne Zanella-Gleason
111W–59L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Beth Guske
5W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tricia Dziabis
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
Jessica Vahey
41W–25L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Dragisa Kupresak
49W–32L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Yvonne Davis
47W–114L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.21
Plamen Pandev
34W–39L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Dina DeLaurentis
53W–64L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Sharon Martinez
115W–167L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Mark MacDonald
19W–37L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michele Motta
35W–40L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nico Gibson
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Gilbertson
53W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.