Teams

LTC - Loren

2023 Broward Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.93 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-03vs Broward/Wank/50&OverC/8.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlicia Dominguez / Penny Arnst vs Sally Guerra / Veronica Wank3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLoren Levine / Donna Evertz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-26vs Veltri - ChenLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Shadid / Alicia Dominguez vs Karen Lu / Peilan Yao2-6, 1-6
2023-09-26vs Broward/Wank/50&OverC/8.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesLoren Levine / Mirella Sprinckmoller vs Sally Guerra / Gloria Coursey4-6, 3-6
2023-09-12vs Veltri - ChenSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAlicia Dominguez / Penny Arnst vs Helene Buechele / Yonghong Chen1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLoren Levine / Edith Schmidt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-25vs Veltri - ChenLost 01
L#1 DoublesLoren Levine / Alicia Dominguez vs Kimberly OMahony / NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA6-7, 4-6
2023-07-11vs Broward/Wank/50&OverC/8.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatherine Shadid / Clarena Furtado vs Sally Guerra / Maria Suarez2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLoren Levine / Alicia Dominguez vs Veronica Wank / Sheri Adler1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Edith Schmidt
published 4
3.85
Katherine Shadid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Susan Spring
published
3.72
Mirella Sprinckmoller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Loren Levine
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.70
Donna Evertz
published 4
3.65
Clarena Furtado
published 4
3.24
Alicia Dominguez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mirella Sprinckmoller + Edith Schmidt6060% games+6.6% vs expected
Loren Levine + Edith Schmidt6357% games−3.2% vs expected
Katherine Shadid + Mirella Sprinckmoller3256% gamesnot enough data
Loren Levine + Mirella Sprinckmoller2351% gamesnot enough data
Alicia Dominguez + Katherine Shadid134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edith Schmidt
52W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Katherine Shadid
84W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
Susan Spring
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Mirella Sprinckmoller
76W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Loren Levine
246W–175L career · 7 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Donna Evertz
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Clarena Furtado
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Alicia Dominguez
74W–151L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.