Teams

Eagle Watch - Susan Hall

Cherokee Summer - USTA Adult 18 & Over Business Women · Business Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-13vs Eagle Watch - RosenburgLost 14
L#1 DoublesKatherine Gibson / Pamela Romain vs Aubrie Powderly / Robyn Gaffney0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Eggers vs Blythe Daniels3-6, 7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJessica Sanderson / Victoria Sheffield vs Kristine Viscio / Bethany Pattillo3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAngella Boyer vs Christie Pusatere5-7, 6-3, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Cornett / Katrina Hines vs Darlene Boyee / Rebecca Bergstrom3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSarah Eggers / Jessica Sanderson vs Natalie Bouchard / Kelly Byers4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMyroslava Melanie Pais Skibindks vs Jessica Bell0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Gibson / Pamela Romain vs Kelley Jackson / Julie Young6-2, 0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAngella Boyer vs Lisa Murphy6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVictoria Sheffield / Melissa Cornett vs Shelly Davis / Abigail Stansberry3-6, 3-6
2025-06-22vs Bradshaw - Liz WeberLost 14
L#1 DoublesSarah Eggers / Jessica Sanderson vs Nadia Fekete / Cassie Szczotka4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Cornett vs Evelyn Avery1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAngella Boyer / Katherine Gibson vs Heather Windbiel / Elizabeth Weber7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesVictoria Sheffield vs Joni Puckett2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Libert / Susan Hall vs Teresa Hayes / Corina Ardelean4-6, 2-6
2025-06-15vs Eagle Watch - RosenburgLost 04
L#1 SinglesAngella Boyer vs Robyn Gaffney4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Hall / Katherine Gibson vs Melissa Aselton / Martha Wiegman4-6, 6-3, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMelissa Cornett vs Kaitlyn Shipskie3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Sanderson / Sarah Eggers vs Colleen Britt / Bethany Pattillo1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJessica Sanderson / Emily Tuggle vs Natalie Bouchard / Julie Arrington0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Eggers vs Jessica Bell7-6, 3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKatherine Gibson / Pamela Romain vs Abigail Stansberry / Deborah Tracy1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDonnetta Harike vs Ellen Lipscomb2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Cornett / Katrina Hines vs Kelly Byers / Kelley Jackson0-6, 1-6
2025-06-01vs Bradshaw - Liz WeberSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJessica Sanderson / Emily Tuggle vs Georgia Baker / Tricia Watts6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatherine Gibson / Pamela Romain vs Cassie Szczotka / Patricia Dunlap6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMyroslava Melanie Pais Skibindks vs Sheryl Yeager2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Libert / Andrea Lovett vs Vibeke Sorensen / Teresa Hayes3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Business Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Angella Boyer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Katherine Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Andrea Lovett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Donnetta Harike
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Emily Tuggle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Pamela Romain
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Sarah Eggers
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.47
Victoria Sheffield
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Melissa Cornett
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.17
Allison Libert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Katrina Hines
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Myroslava Melanie Pais Skibindks
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Romain + Katherine Gibson2340% games−12.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Angella Boyer
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Katherine Gibson
5W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Andrea Lovett
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Donnetta Harike
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Emily Tuggle
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pamela Romain
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Sarah Eggers
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
Victoria Sheffield
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
Melissa Cornett
0W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.45
2.5
Allison Libert
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Katrina Hines
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Myroslava Melanie Pais Skibindks
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.