Teams

SSG RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-20vs BM GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJerry Barnhill / Dennis Lezotte vs Eliot Payson / Michael Burgess3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAllan Wainwright vs Pat Hanley6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPatrick Broe / Joe Marino vs David Cole / David Wadsworth1-6, 3-6
2022-07-19vs CK BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesAllan Wainwright / Robert Ryan vs Timothy Parker / Joe Martinez7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJoe Marino vs Raul Uribe4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJerry Barnhill / Dennis Lezotte vs Jason Massicotte / Scott DEEM7-6, 1-4
W#3 DoublesJoel Gesink / Charles Viss vs Jay Wren / Nicolas Newey7-6, 6-4
2022-07-13vs BCST REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesDennis Lezotte / James Jessup vs Jason Akers / Glen Mizenko4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAllan Wainwright / Charles Viss vs Mark Anderson / Tom Hannigan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPatrick Broe / Jerry Barnhill vs Benton Smith / Derek Passarelli6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-07-11vs KC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesAllan Wainwright / James Jessup vs Jon Cram / Jason Hand7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJoe Marino vs Randy Lazzell6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoel Gesink / Greg Ham vs David Frederick / John Tiernan0-4
L#3 DoublesPatrick Broe / Robert Ryan vs William Daniels / Ron Dart3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-22vs KC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJoe Marino / Allan Wainwright vs Michael Hursta / Sean Kavanaugh5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRandall van Roekel vs Jim Conzelman6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDennis Lezotte / James Jessup vs Brian Hansen / Andy Roemersberger7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGreg Ham / Patrick Broe vs Ken Sharpeta / Bryan McGee6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-15vs PH GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoe Marino / James Jessup vs Matthew McFall / Lawrence Kim6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobert Ryan / Greg Ham vs Pierre Powell / Stan Mohler1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRandall van Roekel / Charles Viss vs Nick Politano / John Edwards3-6, 3-6
2022-06-08vs GR BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesGreg Ham / Joe Marino vs Jason Linscott / Brett Linscott3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRandall van Roekel vs Geoffrey Uhl1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Ryan / James Jessup vs Chris Herring / Robert Sanders6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCharles Viss / Patrick Broe vs Kurt Niepraschk / Doug Killeen1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Thomas Chalk
published
Allan Wainwright
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Greg Ham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Joe Marino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.07
Joel Gesink
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Jerry Barnhill
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Randall van Roekel
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Robert Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Dennis Lezotte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.74
Charles Viss
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Patrick Broe
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
James Jessup
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joel Gesink + Randall van Roekel3451% games+6.5% vs expected
Charles Viss + Randall van Roekel4545% games+1.7% vs expected
Patrick Broe + Robert Ryan1743% games−2.6% vs expected
Robert Ryan + Jerry Barnhill0635% games−3.5% vs expected
Patrick Broe + Jerry Barnhill71744% games−4.8% vs expected
Charles Viss + Joel Gesink91744% games−5.0% vs expected
Dennis Lezotte + Jerry Barnhill0534% games−11.6% vs expected
Patrick Broe + Greg Ham6252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Chalk
17W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Allan Wainwright
36W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Greg Ham
31W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Joe Marino
64W–73L career · 6 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Joel Gesink
18W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Jerry Barnhill
43W–67L career · 3 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.06
Randall van Roekel
12W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Robert Ryan
39W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Dennis Lezotte
11W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Charles Viss
16W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Patrick Broe
38W–81L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
James Jessup
18W–11L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.