Teams

Nelson, Cydney

2023 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 5.0 - Weekend · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.58 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-30vs Neidert, PamelaWon 10
W#1 SinglesLindsey Horner vs Jill Cannon6-3, 6-2
2023-04-16vs Root, AndreaWon 10
W#2 DoublesLindsey Horner / Brenda Moore vs Andrea Root / Kimberly Braun6-4, 6-3
2023-04-02vs Neidert, PamelaSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnn McLiney vs Risi Oseni2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAngel Krishna / Natalie Hall vs Jacqueline Kenoly / Nancy Yost7-6, 3-3, 1-0
2023-03-05vs Norman, PhyllisWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Moore / Carol Tenpenny vs Susan Mayer / Katherine Bruner7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-05vs Meigs, BarbaraWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Shore / Nicole Satterwhite vs Pam Kerr / Nora Jackson6-4, 6-4
2023-02-05vs McConkey, SusanLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn McLiney / Brenda Moore vs Judy Yi / Zhou Zhou5-7, 0-6
2023-01-29vs HOA/Hunt/40&Over3.5WWon 31
L#1 DoublesAnn McLiney / Jennifer Shore vs Jessie Pullins / Julie Rome6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristina Porto vs Samantha Green6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaria Moore / Kristi LaMothe vs Amy Kentfield / Monique Marquette6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRebecca Broce / Nicole Satterwhite vs Bree Ginden / Allison Sizemore6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Christina Porto
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.51
Rebecca Broce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Marjorie Jones
published
3.22
Nicole Satterwhite
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Ann McLiney
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Brenda Moore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Jennifer Shore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.07
Angela Hagen
published 3.5
3.04
Cydney Nelson
published 3.5
3.04
Maria Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Natalie Hall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Sara Gilson
published
Kathy Hawley
published
Kim Chappelow-Lee
published
Kristi LaMothe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Horner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Baker
published
Natalie Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Chappelow-Lee + Ann McLiney4750% games+4.7% vs expected
Nicole Satterwhite + Natalie Hall8066% games+4.3% vs expected
Marjorie Jones + Rebecca Broce5257% games+3.7% vs expected
Kristi LaMothe + Ann McLiney4161% games+3.5% vs expected
Maria Moore + Kristi LaMothe14556% games+3.3% vs expected
Brenda Moore + Nicole Satterwhite9856% games+2.8% vs expected
Marjorie Jones + Ann McLiney11755% games+1.0% vs expected
Jennifer Shore + Rebecca Broce3257% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Porto
54W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Rebecca Broce
36W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Marjorie Jones
43W–38L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22
Nicole Satterwhite
58W–49L career · 1 line in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Ann McLiney
76W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Brenda Moore
46W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Jennifer Shore
113W–134L career · 8 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Angela Hagen
33W–46L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cydney Nelson
27W–28L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Maria Moore
58W–89L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.04
Natalie Hall
27W–40L career · 1 line in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Sara Gilson
29W–44L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.88
Kathy Hawley
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Chappelow-Lee
92W–169L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristi LaMothe
51W–36L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Horner
42W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Baker
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Natalie Smith
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.