Teams

OC Palisades - Hellene - Sat 130

2024 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend

14 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-28vs OC LLW Cute on the Court - MakLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Ford / Jennifer Murdy vs Laura McManus / Kirtine Yang5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesShelley Vrungos / Jennifer Murdy vs Stephanie Chung / Su Prijyanonda6-3, 6-1
2024-08-11vs OC LLW Cute on the Court - MakLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Murdy / Kelly Ford vs Laura McManus / Christina Catipay3-6, 1-6
2024-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesShelley Vrungos / Jennifer Murdy vs Julie Le / Stephanie Chung6-0, 6-3
L#1 DoublesShelley Vrungos / Jennifer Murdy vs Kristina Chen / Chi Rauen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Colleen Scanlon
published 4.5
4.30
Jennifer Murdy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Chelsea Loomis
published 4.5
4.12
Kelly Ford
published
3.66
Maria Heropoulos
published
3.64
Sunny Park
published
3.39
Lyn Soma
published
3.36
Karen Brink
published
3.35
Lindsay Miller
published
3.13
Lori Ratzlaff
published
3.08
Hellene Thurston
published 3.5
3.07
Elizabeth Hogan
published 3.5
Jecel Maniscalco
published
Leslie Lindahl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Ratzlaff + Jecel Maniscalco3356% games+11.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Hogan + Lyn Soma2356% games+7.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Colleen Scanlon
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Jennifer Murdy
44W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Chelsea Loomis
48W–64L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Kelly Ford
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
4.12
Maria Heropoulos
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
Sunny Park
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
Lyn Soma
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
Karen Brink
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Lindsay Miller
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.35
Lori Ratzlaff
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Hellene Thurston
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Elizabeth Hogan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
Jecel Maniscalco
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Lindahl
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.