Teams

MTC-Crews

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-26vs RAIN-BryanLost 01
L#2 DoublesDan Weese / Lindsay Hardage vs Peter Gallagher / Jennifer Morris2-6, 4-6
2023-03-25vs WW-HarkerLost 01
L#2 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Lindsay Hardage vs James Moslow / Amy Ringberg7-6, 2-4
2023-03-11vs BURK-BucklesWon 10
W#3 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Lindsay Hardage vs April Buckles / Henry Rosenbaum6-1, 7-6
2023-03-04vs WW-JesseeLost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsay Hardage / Lewis Farinholt vs Mark Wickersham / Christine Albrecht1-6, 0-6
2023-02-25vs SAL-ConsolvoWon 10
W#1 DoublesDan Weese / Lindsay Hardage vs MICHAEL RYAN / Margaret Ryan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-19vs ACAC-GhitaLost 01
L#3 DoublesDan Weese / Lindsay Hardage vs Susan Lockhart / Stone Smith6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-11vs WO-BlackwoodWon 10
W#2 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Lindsay Hardage vs Keyur Shah / Tia Thomas7-6, 3-3
2023-01-29vs MAC-TalamoLost 01
L#3 DoublesLindsay Hardage / Dan Weese vs Donna Talamo / Byron Roberts3-6, 4-6
2023-01-08vs HERM-MartinWon 10
W#3 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Lindsay Hardage vs YOUNG CHOE / Elizabeth Wiertel6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Lindsay Hardage
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Noelle Crews
published
Corinne Hilbert
published 3
Eugene Johnson
published
Kathleen Laroche
published
Kenneth Adams
published
Kristen Fletcher
published
Lewis Farinholt
published
Rob Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noelle Crews + Rob Williams4450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lindsay Hardage
93W–63L career · 9 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
Noelle Crews
37W–37L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3
Corinne Hilbert
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Eugene Johnson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Laroche
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kenneth Adams
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristen Fletcher
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lewis Farinholt
3W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rob Williams
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.