Teams

Marion/Haynes

2026 Marion Adult 55 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Sunday

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-13vs FK 55+ 7.0 GREENE TEAMLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Plumlee / Kristin Milbrandt vs Marlene Townsend / Marisa McLeod3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Haynes / Kathy Hatfield vs Tina Thomas / Diane Johnston6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDonna Jarvis / Deborah Borge-Shaffer vs Maggie Berardi / Bonnie Keating6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-01vs SkyviewWon 21
L#1 DoublesAngie Insco / Pamela Plumlee vs Lynne Finman / Tracy Shisler6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Haynes / Carol Mecca vs Irma Buttermore / Tana Hubbard6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDonna Jarvis / Ellen Perrone vs Carmen Rosengarten / Carol Hirsch6-0, 6-1
2026-02-22vs Glenview PerkinsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Haynes / Hera Peterson vs Robin Lancaster / Maricel Keiter6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarol Mecca / Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce vs Sally Perkins / Patricia James6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Jarvis / Kristin Milbrandt vs Diane Cassidy / Catherine Sersen2-6, 2-6
2026-02-07vs FK Queens of the CourtWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngie Insco / Pamela Plumlee vs Jane Kaul / Niurca Gloria6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHera Peterson / Cheryl Prusak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-01-30vs FK 55+ 7.0 GREENE TEAMWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Haynes / Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce vs Jennifer Halinski / Rhonda Lane7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDonna Jarvis / Ellen Perrone vs Terri Lowery / Marlene Townsend0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Hatfield / Deborah Borge-Shaffer vs Ronda Knutson / Maggie Berardi6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-25vs SkyviewWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuteera Chaisumrej Joyce / Hera Peterson vs Tracy Shisler / Lynne Finman1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Haynes / Cheryl Prusak vs Tana Hubbard / Petrea Coleman7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathy Hatfield / Deborah Borge-Shaffer vs Irma Buttermore / Rita Meek4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-01-24vs Glenview Village Volley GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Borge-Shaffer / Kathy Hatfield vs Jill Eng / Diane Josselyn6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Haynes / Carol Mecca vs Julie Davidson / Michelle Nathan6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Jarvis / Ellen Perrone vs Terry Sturm / Melanie Turner7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-11vs FK WalshWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Haynes / Carol Mecca vs Kimberly Scudder Thompson / Jennifer Russell6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPamela Plumlee / Angie Insco vs Barbara Slatton / Michelle Broder6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Hatfield / Donna Jarvis vs Rebecca Durham / Mary Jeanne Walsh4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Carol Mecca
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Cheryl Prusak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Deborah Borge-Shaffer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Kathy Hatfield
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Ellen Perrone
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.95
Angie Insco
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Kristin Milbrandt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Donna Jarvis
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Hera Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Pamela Plumlee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Hatfield + Deborah Borge-Shaffer303 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Perrone + Donna Jarvis213 matchesnot enough data
Carol Mecca + Julie Haynes303 matchesnot enough data
Angie Insco + Pamela Plumlee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Mecca
7W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Cheryl Prusak
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Deborah Borge-Shaffer
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Kathy Hatfield
60W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Ellen Perrone
88W–117L career · 7 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Angie Insco
2W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Kristin Milbrandt
13W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
2.94
Donna Jarvis
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hera Peterson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Haynes
10W–1L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pamela Plumlee
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.