← Teams

MAC-Bilstrom

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Shannon Bilstrom
published 4.5
3.87
Darci Keljo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Lisa Handley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.84
Brooke Burnett
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.76
Courtney Pierce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Geraldine Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Heidi Wilcox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Catherine Go
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
—
Katy Marcy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-06-11Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesBrooke Burnett / Lisa Handley vs Heather Dudley / Kristi Vargas6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaty Marcy / Sheila Anderson vs Joelle Lewis / Judith Kobin6-2, 7-6
2022-06-05Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesBrooke Burnett / Lisa Handley vs Sue Edmonds / Susan Agee6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCatherine Go / Linda Lovett vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCatherine Go / Shannon Bilstrom vs Michelle Dombek / Kris Kelly-Koster6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Courtney Pierce vs Christina Wright / Lisa Barsotti6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSheila Anderson / Katy Marcy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesGeraldine Carter / Darci Keljo vs Kelly Mohr / Donna Kennish7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShannon Bilstrom / Heidi Wilcox vs Karen Dellinger / Traci Harris3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Go / Brooke Burnett vs Rie Sasakawa / Carla Wheeler7-5, 7-6
2022-05-08Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesCatherine Go / Linda Lovett vs Leah Buxman / Christy Strange6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheila Anderson / Courtney Pierce vs Mary Klinger / Sara van Beckum4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCatherine Go / Gina Wissmiller vs Katherine Kralj / Liz DelPlato6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrooke Burnett / Heidi Wilcox vs Penny Birkhofer / Nenette Olson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaty Marcy / Kim Spathas vs Barbara Seatter / Lisa Clevenger6-1, 6-4
2022-04-30Won 2–1
L#1 SinglesKaty Marcy vs Kristin Spear6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Courtney Pierce vs Teresa Sullivan / Kaelin Teo7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Handley / Darci Keljo vs Kristie Leake / Bo Yu6-4, 7-6
2022-04-24Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesDarci Keljo / Geraldine Carter vs Chizuru Watanabe / Kyoko Adcock3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Wilcox / Shannon Bilstrom vs Kayleen Mendenhall / Shannon Roarke3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Shannon Bilstrom
13W–21L career
not enough data
—
4
Darci Keljo
55W–36L career
0%97%3%
3.87
4.5
Lisa Handley
41W–32L career
56%44%0%
3.84
4.5
Brooke Burnett
23W–27L career · type A
56%44%0%
3.84
4
Courtney Pierce
28W–24L career
2%97%1%
3.76
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Geraldine Carter
29W–28L career
20%80%1%
3.61
4
Heidi Wilcox
86W–87L career
15%85%0%
3.58
4
Catherine Go
87W–77L career
18%82%0%
3.58
0
Katy Marcy
28W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.