Teams

Broward - Veltri/Wank

2022 Broward Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.21 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-01vs Ltc - Nifty50Won 20
W#2 DoublesGloria Coursey / RENEE ALEXIS vs Loren Levine / Marci Feder4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Brozzi / Kumiko Currie vs Ellen Raskin / Susan Hotujec6-3, 6-1
2022-09-01vs Ltc - Nifty50Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Brozzi / RENEE ALEXIS vs Susan Hotujec / Lori Paglini7-6, 6-3
2022-08-20vs Ltc - Nifty50Won 20
W#1 DoublesJill Rickey / Lorena Villar vs Clarena Furtado / Cindy Conine6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGloria Coursey / RENEE ALEXIS vs Suzanne Mesko / Theresa Caruso6-2, 6-0
2022-08-02vs Ltc - Nifty50Won 10
W#3 DoublesJill Rickey / Lorena Villar vs Sherril Colombo / Susan Hotujec6-3, 6-1
2022-07-26vs Ltc - Nifty50Won 10
W#2 DoublesNatalia Moll / Lorena Villar vs Suzanne Mesko / Theresa Caruso6-2, 7-5
2022-07-19vs Ltc - Nifty50Won 10
W#1 DoublesJill Rickey / Lorena Villar vs Natalia de Gregorio / Barbara Cabral6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Natalia Moll
published
4.29
Kumiko Currie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.21
RENEE ALEXIS
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.08
Jill Rickey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.04
Gloria Coursey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
3.81
Veronica Wank
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Sharon Tompkins
published
3.79
Lorena Villar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Maria Brozzi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorena Villar + RENEE ALEXIS7356% gamesnot enough data
Kumiko Currie + Jill Rickey4547% gamesnot enough data
Kumiko Currie + Veronica Wank3548% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Villar + Jill Rickey5356% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Coursey + RENEE ALEXIS5157% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Coursey + Lorena Villar3250% gamesnot enough data
Jill Rickey + RENEE ALEXIS2353% gamesnot enough data
Jill Rickey + Veronica Wank2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalia Moll
29W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
Kumiko Currie
112W–81L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
RENEE ALEXIS
92W–123L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Jill Rickey
109W–122L career · 4 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Gloria Coursey
103W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
4.04
4
Daniela Hernandez
32W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Veronica Wank
149W–154L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Sharon Tompkins
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Lorena Villar
207W–130L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Maria Brozzi
152W–217L career · 2 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.