Teams

SCC Lineberger

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.14 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-14vs WW Ninjas - BakerWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Steinour / Joseph Andy Gilbert vs Patrick Gee / Mike Webb7-6, 7-5
2025-08-31vs Woodlake Patterson 8.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Daniel Poole vs Ken Patterson / Wieslaw Gumulak5-7, 1-6
2025-08-24vs Burkwood Butterworth 8.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCooper Steinour / Joseph Andy Gilbert vs Keith Harvey / Richard Clark7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-16vs MAC SnowSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoseph Andy Gilbert / Scott Steinour vs Chuck Snow / Charles Samson7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Richard Lloyd vs Adam Hamilton / Matthew Morris7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-10vs DeepRunners - KallamSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCharles Means / Stuart Fulcher vs Bhargavaram Kallam / Madhav Kidambi6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDrew Lineberger / Joseph Andy Gilbert vs Lee Brooks / Douglas Scammell6-4, 6-1
2025-08-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph Andy Gilbert / Scott Steinour vs Ryan Baker / Mike Webb6-7, 0-6
2025-07-27vs Woodlake Patterson 8.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDrew Lineberger / Joseph Andy Gilbert vs Bradley Glen / Ken Patterson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cooper Steinour
published 4.5
4.12
Stuart Fulcher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Geoff Usher
published
3.98
Joseph Andy Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published 4
3.96
Jay Nelson
published
3.83
David Voth
published 4
3.79
Richard Lloyd
published
3.79
Daniel Poole
published 4
3.77
Andrew Zima
published 4
3.75
Charles Means
published 4
3.71
Mark Holland
published
Drew Lineberger
published
Scott Broaddus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Andy Gilbert + Daniel Poole5074% games+15.0% vs expected
Charles Means + Andrew Zima134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cooper Steinour
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Stuart Fulcher
149W–170L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Geoff Usher
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.10
4
Joseph Andy Gilbert
144W–36L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.98
Jay Nelson
14W–18L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
David Voth
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Richard Lloyd
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Daniel Poole
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Andrew Zima
23W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Charles Means
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Mark Holland
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Drew Lineberger
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Broaddus
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.