Teams

Cheval Fellowship of the Strings - M. David

2024 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-16vs Hills/Palmer/18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoel Sparr / Louis Hanna vs Gvozden Dokic / Jack Korta0-6, 4-6
2024-03-09vs TYCC Yacht Rock - B. RockwoodLost 01
L#1 DoublesAleksandar Seovic / Joel Sparr vs Dan Burns / James Baker5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-10vs Pirates of HCC - F. RussianLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Dayton / Joel Sparr vs Eric Beare / Jordan Ghaemmaghami6-7, 4-6
2024-02-06vs TYCC Yacht Rock - B. RockwoodLost 01
L#2 SinglesJoel Sparr vs Jacob Munch4-6, 2-6
2024-01-13vs Hills/Cantu/18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesNeil Corella / Joel Sparr vs Dave Allison / Jeremy Stuart6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Andrew Busby
published 4
3.42
Matthew David
published
3.35
3.33
Kenneth Sallings
published
3.26
Edward Lindblom
published 3.5
3.20
Ken Patrick
published
3.17
Somil Kadakia
published
3.11
Joel Sparr
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.07
Aleksandar Seovic
published 3.5
2.94
James Feeney
published 3.5
Jeffrey Platteis
published
Michael Dayton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Sallings + Somil Kadakia5554% games+4.5% vs expected
Kalicharan Durgampudi + Ken Patrick224 matchesnot enough data
James Feeney + Ken Patrick033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Busby
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Matthew David
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
Kalicharan Durgampudi
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kenneth Sallings
24W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Edward Lindblom
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
Ken Patrick
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Somil Kadakia
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Joel Sparr
50W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Aleksandar Seovic
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
James Feeney
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.94
Jeffrey Platteis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Dayton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.