Teams

I'm not throwing away my shot

2023 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Kendra Rothert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Ann-Marie Lundberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dipali Dixit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2023-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDipali Dixit / Kendra Rothert vs Lisa Hockman / Mai-Anh Nguyen6-2, 6-1
2023-08-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDipali Dixit / Jennifer Weaver vs Alma Siri / Maria Siri7-6, 6-4
2023-08-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnn-Marie Lundberg / Jane King Ayers vs Lorri Asder / Pamela Meyer6-0, 7-5
2023-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesKendra Rothert / Jane King Ayers vs Karen Kraus / Christine Egan7-6, 7-5
2023-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesKendra Rothert / Jane King Ayers vs Philberta Leung / Lorri Asder6-3, 6-4
2023-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnn-Marie Lundberg / Rachel Nies vs Emma Scherzer / Madeleine Bourland2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesDipali Dixit / Ann-Marie Lundberg vs Manisha Thakkar / Theresa Hagerty6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Kendra Rothert
46W–56L career
4%96%0%
3.18
3.5
Ann-Marie Lundberg
63W–71L career
41%59%0%
2.97
3
Dipali Dixit
40W–48L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.