Teams

Andresen - RS Clay

2022 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-07-19vs Bryan - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Sloan / Ingrid Corbett vs Ginger Jeffcoat / Lisa Greskovich6-2, 6-4
2022-06-07vs Bryan - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesIngrid Corbett / Pressly Weil vs Ann Scott / Polly Armstrong0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-10vs Payne - RS HardWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Sloan / Ingrid Corbett vs Tonya Chase / Sally Bergosh6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Sam Richardson
published
Alycia Esmonde
published 4
3.63
Lisa Andresen
published
3.52
Amanda Brown
published 4
3.42
Karen Penn
published
3.30
Sue Nast
published
3.29
Ingrid Corbett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Susan Barlow
published
2.88
Pressly Weil
published
2.80
Jenya Burkett
published
2.64
Barbara French
published 3
Tanya Hughes
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sam Richardson
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.96
4
Alycia Esmonde
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Andresen
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Amanda Brown
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
Karen Penn
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Sue Nast
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Ingrid Corbett
67W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Susan Barlow
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Pressly Weil
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
Jenya Burkett
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Barbara French
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Tanya Hughes
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.