Teams

Martin

2025 Sequoyah Southern Tri-Level 18 & Over - Spring · Ladies 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-21vs Sequoyah/Heather HayesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Cargle / Allison Harrison vs Becky Opoien / Elisa Bland1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Gumm / Jennifer Martin vs Heather Hayes / Neeve Owen4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBecky George / Ashley Venkatesu vs Terina Fowler / Jill Robinson0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-14vs Sequoyah/Heather HayesWon 20
W#2 DoublesSarah Cargle / Calli Davis vs Lawanna Chang / Suni Carroll6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarlee Allen / Becky George vs Jamie Harmer / Jill Robinson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-08vs Sequoyah/Heather HayesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Cargle / Allison Harrison vs Alisa Price / Becky Opoien1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLindsey Langhans / Jennifer Martin vs Neeve Owen / Kelly Roberts7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarlee Allen / Chris Tarpley vs Karma Goodson / Kim Shook6-4, 6-3
2025-04-30vs Sequoyah/Heather HayesLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsey Langhans / Allison Harrison vs Becky Opoien / Danielle Mcauley1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMarlee Allen / Calli Davis vs Suni Carroll / Margie Patton6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChris Tarpley / Ashley Venkatesu vs Terina Fowler / Kim Adams1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Allison Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.73
Calli Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Lindsey Langhans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Meredith Gumm
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Becky George
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.19
Chris Tarpley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.74
Ashley Venkatesu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Marlee Allen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Harrison
18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Calli Davis
46W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Lindsey Langhans
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Meredith Gumm
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
4
Becky George
27W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.23
3.5
Chris Tarpley
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Ashley Venkatesu
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.74
Marlee Allen
14W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.