Teams

Berry

2021 Frederick County Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-09vs Connelly 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Lorene Cannella vs Mary Jo Roberton / Kerry Spicer7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2021-05-29vs Connelly 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJana Conigliaro / Kimberly Wells vs Wendy Heger / Samantha Gass4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-05-15vs Connelly 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa McIntire / Carisa Dueweke vs Stephanie Almeida / Lynn Daggett2-6, 2-6
2021-05-12vs Connelly 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJana Conigliaro / Kimberly Wells vs Mary Jo Roberton / Christine Pagendarm5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLinda McArthur vs Amy Dipasquale2-6, 0-6
2021-05-06vs Connelly 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJana Conigliaro / Kimberly Wells vs Karen Seyler / Deidre Johnson6-3, 6-4
2021-05-04vs Connelly 4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Wells / Jana Conigliaro vs Samantha Gass / Quynh Tran3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLorene Cannella / Carisa Dueweke vs Christine Pagendarm / Mary Jo Roberton0-6, 4-6
2021-04-29vs Connelly 4.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Baker / Linda McArthur vs Karen Seyler / Kerry Spicer1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJana Conigliaro vs Lacey Gordon6-3, 6-1
2021-04-27vs Connelly 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda McArthur / Sabrina Alban vs Amy Dipasquale / Lacey Gordon3-6, 2-6
2021-04-25vs Connelly 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJana Conigliaro / Kimberly Wells vs Stephanie Almeida / Karen Seyler6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Jana Conigliaro
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.64
Kimberly Wells
published
3.53
Christina Truax
published 4
3.50
Sabrina Alban
published
3.25
Carisa Dueweke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.02
Linda McArthur
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Elisa Oaksmith
published 3.5
Millette Miller
published
Zola Allen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jana Conigliaro
267W–142L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
Kimberly Wells
7W–18L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.64
4
Christina Truax
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.53
Sabrina Alban
19W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.50
4
Carisa Dueweke
74W–148L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
3.25
3.5
Linda McArthur
73W–81L career · 6 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Elisa Oaksmith
2W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
2.94
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Zola Allen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.