Teams

Hills/ Alhadeff

2022 Hillsborough Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-09vs Hills/AbramsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaurie Smith / Monty Johnson vs Janet Karpan / Brad Armagost5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRhonda Mendoza / John Hockin vs Zobeida Canfield / Chris Canfield6-2, 7-5
2022-09-25vs Arbor Greene - S. RoySplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrian Hodapp / Elizabeth Burdick vs Leticia Leppert / Jose Alomar6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Hockin / Laurie Smith vs Marie Bialousz / Paul Zack7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-18vs Hills/AbramsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrian Hodapp / Laurie Smith vs Ray Pasinski / Janet Karpan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonty Johnson / Kathleen Stein vs Randall Meisner / Karen Abrams6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-28vs Arbor Greene - S. RoySplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Burdick / Brian Hodapp vs Melissa Sheridan / Sylvain Gauthier6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRhonda Mendoza / Dane Houston vs Caralyn Paul / Paul Zack2-6, 1-6
2022-08-21vs Hills/AbramsWon 20
W#2 DoublesRhonda Mendoza / Dane Houston vs Zobeida Canfield / Chris Canfield7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Smith / Brian Hodapp vs Anne-Lucie Bouchard / Ray Pasinski3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-08-07vs Arbor Greene - S. RoyLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Smith / Monty Johnson vs Leticia Leppert / Jose Alomar1-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Melanie Clem
published
3.89
Brian Hodapp
published 4
3.87
Rhonda Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Monty Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
3.76
Elizabeth Burdick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Chris Eversole
published 4
3.74
John Hockin
published
3.70
Lynn O'Brien
published
3.62
Laurie Smith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.54
Dane Houston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Xiao Zhang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monty Johnson + Laurie Smith351558% games+10.3% vs expected
Rhonda Mendoza + Dane Houston213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Clem
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Brian Hodapp
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Rhonda Mendoza
162W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Monty Johnson
134W–108L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Elizabeth Burdick
222W–79L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Chris Eversole
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Hockin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Lynn O'Brien
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Laurie Smith
232W–110L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Dane Houston
155W–187L career · 2 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Xiao Zhang
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.