Teams

MTC - Cook

2024 Richmond Mixed 55 & Over · Richmond Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-01vs Avalon WilliamsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Holahan / Lewis Farinholt vs Margaret Duke / Brad Williamson4-6, 2-6
2024-07-25vs Avalon WilliamsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Weisberg / Gregory Ewald vs Beth Jones / Brad Williamson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-07-18vs Avalon WilliamsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandra Holahan / Kenneth Adams vs Margaret Duke / Gabriel Ghita6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-11vs Avalon WilliamsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Weisberg / Gregory Ewald vs Laurie Huizenga / Brad Williamson7-6, 6-2
2024-06-27vs Avalon WilliamsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Weisberg / Bob Thagard vs Sheri Carlyle / Gabriel Ghita6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-19vs Avalon WilliamsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Holahan / Lewis Farinholt vs Laurie Huizenga / Richard Bland0-6, 6-7
2024-06-13vs Avalon WilliamsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Weisberg / Gregory Ewald vs Beth Jones / Brad Williamson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Denise Weisberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Betsy Civilette
published 3.5
3.19
Carol Beth Cook
published 3.5
3.17
Gregory Ewald
published
3.14
Gail Cavallaro
published
3.13
Tracy Marks
published
3.10
Sandra Holahan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Doug Cook
published
Eugene Johnson
published
Kathleen Laroche
published
Kenneth Adams
published
Lewis Farinholt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Weisberg
174W–160L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Betsy Civilette
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Carol Beth Cook
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Gregory Ewald
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Gail Cavallaro
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.14
Tracy Marks
12W–16L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Sandra Holahan
59W–94L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Doug Cook
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Eugene Johnson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Laroche
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kenneth Adams
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lewis Farinholt
3W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.