Teams

FIT:Supreme Court:Palumbo

2023 SCT Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 3

17 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-02-05vs KH:Ace Kickers:Mallon/MeyerWon 21
W#1 DoublesLorraine Palumbo / Kenneth Palumbo vs Jeffrey Nelson / Jessica Holscott1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZorba Lieberman / Andrea Nadel vs Ian Konecke / Sarah Konecke6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJenna Baker / Evan Nadel vs David Meyer / Nicole Brady2-6, 2-6
2023-01-07vs INT:Mixed Nuts:Donnelly/CourtneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesKenneth Palumbo / Lorraine Palumbo vs Anna Vella / Derek Thatcher6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulia Genser / Andrew Genser vs Milo Bernstein / Carissa Siegner6-3, 6-0
2022-12-03vs KH:Ace Kickers:Mallon/MeyerLost 12
L#1 DoublesKenneth Palumbo / Lorraine Palumbo vs Eric Gaaserud / Millyn Gaaserud7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Danchak / Evan Nadel vs Josh Thomas / Kelly Thomas6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErika Miller / Brad Miller vs Joseph Blazovic / Rebecca Soskin4-6, 1-6
2022-10-30vs INT:Mixed Nuts:Donnelly/CourtneyLost 12
L#1 DoublesZorba Lieberman / Andrea Nadel vs Derek Thatcher / Maureen Greenberg6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEvan Nadel / Stephanie Mercado vs Rabia Hayden / Alex Stambuk6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDeborah Lloyd / John Arici vs John F Jr Courtney / Cassandra Petersen4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesAnna Danchak / Mark Danchak vs Jennifer Brady / David Harmston2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 3 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Andrea Nadel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Evan Nadel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Stephanie Mercado
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Genser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Deborah Lloyd
published 3.5
3.21
Anna Danchak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Lorraine Palumbo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Julia Genser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Selina Huber
published
2.79
Erika Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Arici
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kenneth Palumbo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Gordon
published
Mark Danchak
published
Mehmet Pasa
published
Theodore Huber
published
Zorba Lieberman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Nadel + Evan Nadel12267% games+12.9% vs expected
Selina Huber + Theodore Huber41944% gamesnot enough data
Lorraine Palumbo + Kenneth Palumbo18558% gamesnot enough data
Julia Genser + Andrew Genser6456% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Mercado + Evan Nadel4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Nadel
65W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
Evan Nadel
39W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Stephanie Mercado
46W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Andrew Genser
9W–4L career · type M · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Deborah Lloyd
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Anna Danchak
46W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Lorraine Palumbo
44W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Julia Genser
31W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
Selina Huber
36W–78L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.91
Erika Miller
19W–35L career · 1 line in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.79
John Arici
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kenneth Palumbo
22W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Gordon
20W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Danchak
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mehmet Pasa
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Theodore Huber
4W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Zorba Lieberman
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.