Teams

ORINDA CC 18AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
3.88
Peter Holst
published
3.85
Alton Schmitt
published 4
3.79
Robert Sorenson
published
Alex Duff
published 4
3.73
Jonathan Harris
published
3.72
Daniel Jenkinson
published 4
3.69
Ben Sandler
published 4
3.69
Harry van Meines
published
3.67
Scot Cunningham
published
3.66
Jake Stewart
published
3.62
Amir Koopah
published 4
3.57
Fraser Ireland
published
3.57
Seth Orvis
published
3.50
Kevin Hack
published
3.49
Michael Brewer
published
3.48
Alex Mooradian
published 3.5
3.47
Cole Bennett
published 3.5
3.19
Joshua Leonard
published
2.99
Glenn Rescalvo
published
Jay Williams
published
Kahn Angsupanich
published
Stephen Barrios
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cole Bennett + Alex Mooradian6158% games+10.9% vs expected
Christopher Nichols + Harry van Meines314 matchesnot enough data
Cole Bennett + Kevin Hack213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Nichols
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.03
Peter Holst
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
4
Alton Schmitt
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Robert Sorenson
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Alex Duff
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Harris
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Daniel Jenkinson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Ben Sandler
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Harry van Meines
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Scot Cunningham
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Jake Stewart
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.66
4
Amir Koopah
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Fraser Ireland
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Seth Orvis
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.57
Kevin Hack
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Michael Brewer
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Alex Mooradian
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Cole Bennett
22W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Joshua Leonard
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.19
Glenn Rescalvo
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Jay Williams
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kahn Angsupanich
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Barrios
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.