Teams

Beattie 7.5 55

2025 Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Adult 55 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-28vs SH 7.5W 55 & Over (Garrison)Split 11
W#1 DoublesTonya Shelton / Dina Beattie vs Cynthia Fennel / Beth Wilbanks2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShelia Brumbalow / Elaine Vaughn vs Sharon Garrison / Tracey Marcu6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-21vs SH 7.5W 55 & Over (Garrison)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTonya Shelton / Elaine Vaughn vs Daphne Jones / Jana Melton5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSabrina Eddins / Michelle Tiffin vs Peggy Claiborne / Lynette Horton2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDina Beattie / Stacy Mason vs Tracey Marcu / Jana Killen2-6, 0-6
2025-08-14vs SH 7.5W 55 & Over (Garrison)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTonya Shelton / Stacy Mason vs Beth Wilbanks / Jana Killen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShelia Brumbalow / Jeanne Self vs Peggy Claiborne / Tracey Marcu1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSheila Smith / Michelle Tiffin vs Sharon Garrison / Lynette Horton1-6, 3-6
2025-08-07vs SH 7.5W 55 & Over (Garrison)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSabrina Eddins / Elaine Vaughn vs Sharon Garrison / Tracey Marcu3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTonya Shelton / Stacy Mason vs Peggy Claiborne / Lynette Horton6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMichelle Tiffin / Shelia Brumbalow vs Cynthia Fennel / Jana Melton1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Adult 55 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SH 7.5W 55 & Over (Garrison)40102672
2Beattie 7.5 550421022138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Sabrina Eddins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Tonya Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Dina Beattie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Jeanne Self
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Elaine Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.01
Michelle Tiffin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Shelia Brumbalow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Vaughn + Michelle Tiffin5262% games+1.6% vs expected
Elaine Vaughn + Jeanne Self161750% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sabrina Eddins
3W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Tonya Shelton
33W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Dina Beattie
5W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanne Self
27W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Elaine Vaughn
36W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Michelle Tiffin
28W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Shelia Brumbalow
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.