Teams

Martin 7.0

2021 Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-08-26vs Nicholson/BontempoLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Mendenhall / Christopher Williams vs Christopher Cerrone / Roselle Nicholson2-6, 4-6
2021-08-22vs KochWon 10
W#2 DoublesRichard Lucas / Lisa Mendenhall vs Joe Gatto / Belinda McLean6-2, 6-2
2021-08-15vs Guys and DollsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Lucas / Lisa Mendenhall vs Audrey Gunther / Barry Herman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-08-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Mendenhall / Richard Lucas vs Stephanie Freeman / Geoffrey Saunders6-2, 6-1
2021-07-25vs King of the CourtLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Lucas / Lisa Mendenhall vs Jenny Lopez / Jorge Paucar6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2021-07-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Mendenhall / Joseph Hunt vs John Lennox / Caroline Roe3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-07-11vs James' Penguin FriendsWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Williams / Meghan Reinhart vs David Dabney / STEPHANIE MILLARD7-5, 6-2
2021-07-11vs James' Penguin FriendsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Lucas / Lisa Mendenhall vs Kushal Patel / Yulin Henry7-5, 6-3
2021-07-07vs The Vicious VolliesWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Lucas / Lisa Mendenhall vs Wayne Powell / Robyn Morton2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-06-27vs KochLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Martin / Christopher Williams vs Michael Bernhard / Holly Hill1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Helen Patterson
published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
published 4
3.60
Lisa Mendenhall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.46
James Forbes
published 3.5
3.27
Mesanie Lee
published
3.26
Meghan Reinhart
published
Christopher Williams
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
Greg Richardson
published 3
Richard Lucas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Williams + Lisa Mendenhall2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helen Patterson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Kelsey Forbes
141W–114L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Lisa Mendenhall
156W–76L career · type A · 8 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
James Forbes
25W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.46
Mesanie Lee
26W–27L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Meghan Reinhart
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Christopher Williams
109W–110L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rebecca Sellassie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Greg Richardson
0W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Richard Lucas
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.