Carter/Jones

2026 Lubbock Adult League 40 & Over · 3.0 Ladies

15 players · average NTRP 2.92 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Schedule5 played

2026-03-09vs BoggsLost 0–3

L#1 DoublesDawn Cox / Ann Lent vs Natasha Newman / Kate Miller2-6, 0-6

L#2 DoublesJill Simpson / Sara Parrott vs Cody Boggs / Leslie Morgan2-6, 2-6

L#3 DoublesLaura Henderson / Ann-Marie Saleh vs Katie Kamper / Jami Broussard3-6, 2-6

2026-03-02vs BoggsLost 1–2

L#1 DoublesHolly Carter / Renee Ross vs Sarah McKoin / Katie Kamper6-7, 6-3, 0-1

W#2 DoublesNoelle Flores / Ann Lent vs Leslie Morgan / Jami Broussard0-6, 6-1, 1-0

L#3 DoublesJacky Nghiem / Sara Parrott vs Jayme Pearson / Kathy Eubanks2-6, 6-2, 0-1

2026-02-23vs BoggsLost 1–3

L#1 DoublesBecky Kerby / Robin Nixon vs Jami Broussard / Leslie Morgan6-7, 3-6

L#1 SinglesClair Jones vs Cody Boggs3-6, 6-7

L#2 DoublesHolly Carter / Robin Perrin vs Sarah McKoin / Katie Kamper4-6, 4-6

W#3 DoublesEmily Jenkins / Jill Simpson vs Teresa Popp / Linda Cartwright6-4, 6-1

2026-02-16vs BoggsWon 2–1

W#1 SinglesDawn Cox vs Valerie Wynn4-6, 6-0, 1-0

W#2 DoublesLaura Henderson / Renee Ross vs Jayme Pearson / Kathy Eubanks6-3, 5-7, 1-0

L#3 DoublesBarbara Wallace / Noelle Flores vs Natasha Newman / Kate Miller2-6, 1-6

2026-02-02vs BoggsWon 3–1

W#1 DoublesBarbara Wallace / Noelle Flores vs Cody Boggs / Leslie Morgan6-3, 5-7, 1-0

L#1 SinglesClair Jones vs Valerie Wynn6-1, 1-6, 0-1

W#2 DoublesBecky Kerby / Ann-Marie Saleh vs Natasha Newman / Jami Broussard0-6, 6-3, 1-0

W#3 DoublesJacky Nghiem / Robin Nixon vs Teresa Popp / Linda Cartwright5-7, 6-4, 1-0

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09

Becky Kerby

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3

3.00

Robin Nixon

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

3.00

Ann-Marie Saleh

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.95

Renee Ross

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

2.92

Jacky Nghiem

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

2.92

Dawn Cox

usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3

2.92

Sara Parrott

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

2.88

Noelle Flores

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —

2.88

Laura Henderson

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published —

2.84

Clair Jones

usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3

—

Barbara Wallace

published 3

2.73

Jill Simpson

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

2.69

Ann Lent

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5

2.62

Robin Perrin

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Emily Jenkins

published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Parrott + Jill Simpson	0–5	27% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Becky Kerby

18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%26%74%

3.09

—

Robin Nixon

16W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%49%51%

3.00

Ann-Marie Saleh

15W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026

<1%49%51%

3.00

—

Renee Ross

12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%63%37%

2.95

—

Jacky Nghiem

10W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%72%28%

2.92

Dawn Cox

10W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%72%28%

2.92

—

Sara Parrott

7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%72%28%

2.92

—

Noelle Flores

21W–40L career · 6 lines in 2026

<1%80%20%

2.88

—

Laura Henderson

12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026

<1%80%20%

2.88

Clair Jones

9W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026

1%86%13%

2.84

Barbara Wallace

4W–2L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jill Simpson

2W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026

5%92%2%

2.73

2.5

Ann Lent

8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026

0%8%92%

2.69

—

Robin Perrin

5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026

20%80%<1%

2.62

—

Emily Jenkins

1W–4L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.