Teams

Aiken/Piedmont 18s 5.0 Combo W Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 5.0 W 18 Thurs PM

12 players · average NTRP 2.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-16vs Barnes 5.0 Combo Fall Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesTia Opyd / Allyson Wood vs Susan Barnes / Leslie Patterson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Sharpe / Lorie Aiken vs Karin Rochester / Julia Saguier1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Michael / Jenilee Fleetwood vs Lori Luempert / Lyndsey Grubb6-1, 6-4
2025-10-04vs Hall 18s 5.0 Combo W Thurs PMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAshleigh Corthum / Jenifer Checo vs Paola Scilinguo-Mendoza / Katherine Shields6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLorie Aiken / Rachel Walters vs Heather Aherne / Colleen Pinyan1-6, 2-6
2025-10-02vs Hall 18s 5.0 Combo W Thurs PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenifer Checo / Barbara Michael vs Paola Scilinguo-Mendoza / Katherine Shields6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLorie Aiken / Ashleigh Corthum vs Julia Jones / Phyllis Lancaster6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTia Opyd / Judy Tsuei vs Sophia de Vries / Heather Aherne6-0, 6-1
2025-09-25vs Barnes 5.0 Combo Fall Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllison Sharpe / Jenna Bialik-Speight vs Susan Barnes / Leslie Patterson0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAllyson Wood / Jenifer Checo vs Julia Saguier / Heather Parrish6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJudy Tsuei / Rachel Walters vs Lyndsey Grubb / Tamenika Delgado6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-11vs Hall 18s 5.0 Combo W Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshleigh Corthum / Allyson Wood vs Paola Scilinguo-Mendoza / Katherine Shields3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLorie Aiken / Barbara Michael vs Kathleen LaMuraglia / Lorena Hall6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllison Sharpe / Jenilee Fleetwood vs Rebecca Richmond / Phyllis Lancaster6-7, 1-6
2025-08-28vs Barnes 5.0 Combo Fall Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenna Bialik-Speight / Allison Sharpe vs Karin Rochester / Susan Barnes1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAshleigh Corthum / Allyson Wood vs Jennifer Payne / Ning Li4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTia Opyd / Jenifer Checo vs Lori Luempert / Tamenika Delgado6-1, 6-1
2025-08-17vs Barnes 5.0 Combo Fall Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesLorie Aiken / Jenilee Fleetwood vs Heather Parrish / Julia Saguier3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Michael / Allison Sharpe vs Cristina Voorheis / Laura Milloway1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAshleigh Corthum / Allyson Wood vs Jennifer Payne / Lori Luempert7-5, 7-5
2025-08-14vs Hall 18s 5.0 Combo W Thurs PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenifer Checo / Ashleigh Corthum vs Kathleen LaMuraglia / Tammy Milani6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLorie Aiken / Barbara Michael vs Sophia de Vries / Lorena Hall6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJenna Bialik-Speight / Tia Opyd vs Heather Aherne / Rebecca Richmond6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 W 18 Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Jenifer Checo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.56
Lorie Aiken
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.51
Ashleigh Corthum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Tia Opyd
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.38
Allyson Wood
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.33
Barbara Michael
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.31
Jenna Bialik-Speight
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Judy Tsuei
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.00
Annette Bagnoli
published 2.5
1.93
Allison Sharpe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Jenilee Fleetwood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rachel Walters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorie Aiken + Ashleigh Corthum2445% games+4.7% vs expected
Allison Sharpe + Rachel Walters044 matchesnot enough data
Ashleigh Corthum + Allyson Wood123 matchesnot enough data
Allison Sharpe + Tia Opyd033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenifer Checo
30W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%13%87%
2.66
Lorie Aiken
10W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Ashleigh Corthum
10W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Tia Opyd
21W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
3
Allyson Wood
15W–24L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
Barbara Michael
6W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
Jenna Bialik-Speight
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.31
Judy Tsuei
8W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Annette Bagnoli
3W–15L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Allison Sharpe
5W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Jenilee Fleetwood
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Walters
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.