Teams

Ruru-Tri 4.0

2023 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.33 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-17vs KRC Tri Have FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Rachel Motta / Alexis Steele6-1, 6-0
2023-09-10vs Tri-Team ALOHAWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Yukie O Brewer / Miyuki Haught7-5, 7-6
2023-09-03vs Out To PlayWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Minza Shiraki-Higa / Cheryl Yoshida6-1, 6-1
2023-08-27vs KRC Miss HitsLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Toguchi / Hanha Youn vs Erica Chong / Praphaporn Downing4-6, 4-6
2023-08-13vs OC SwingersWon 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Toguchi / Hanha Youn vs Kathleen Connolly / Jony Conching6-3, 6-1
2023-08-06vs OC Tri Tri AgainWon 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Toguchi / Hanha Youn vs Kay Suzuki / Joni Tamayo-Wilson6-2, 6-1
2023-07-30vs Tri-HardsWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Sydney Hall / Brooke Heiken6-0, 6-1
2023-07-23vs Shot GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesReina Visaya / Aureana Wong vs Chanel Hebaru / Tamlyn Takeno6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ruru-Tri 4.07171345
2Tri-Team ALOHA6262561
3KRC Miss Hits6262666
4Tri-Hards5353755
5Out To Play35351076
6KRC Tri Have Fun35351286
7OC Swingers17171593
8OC Tri Tri Again08081692

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Reina Visaya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Aureana Wong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Leah Yamamoto
published
3.88
Hanha Youn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Holly Toguchi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Toguchi + Hanha Youn6170% games+12.2% vs expected
Holly Toguchi + Leah Yamamoto4163% games+9.2% vs expected
Hanha Youn + Leah Yamamoto11162% games+7.2% vs expected
Reina Visaya + Aureana Wong28265% games+7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Reina Visaya
81W–15L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Aureana Wong
48W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
Leah Yamamoto
54W–11L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
4.14
Hanha Youn
45W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.88
4
Holly Toguchi
86W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.