Teams

Dutton 18+ 3.5 PC

2026 Anniston · Gadsden

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-04-01vs Sims 18+ 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Barnes / Magen Bearden vs Carolyne Marsh / Grace Brown6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Gadsden
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sims 18+ 3.53184991
2Dutton 18+ 3.5 PC134816109

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Allie Dutton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Kelly Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Kim Tipton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Angela Weissgerber
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
ANGELA Dutton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Nora Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Magen Bearden
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Wendy Uhrin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allie Dutton + ANGELA Dutton71045% games+2.6% vs expected
Magen Bearden + Angela Weissgerber2346% gamesnot enough data
Angela Weissgerber + Nora Stokes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allie Dutton
32W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Kelly Barnes
23W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Kim Tipton
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Angela Weissgerber
11W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
ANGELA Dutton
36W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Nora Stokes
20W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
Magen Bearden
10W–8L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Uhrin
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.