Teams

Meade

2021 Frederick County Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-27vs TempleLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodie Phillips / Mary Beth Herrera vs Sarah Speirs / Christina Truax3-6, 3-6
2021-05-24vs TempleLost 01
L#2 DoublesDeborah Dettmer / Joanna Coffey vs Anne Monks / Sara Kubik4-6, 2-6
2021-05-19vs TempleLost 01
L#2 SinglesDeborah Dettmer vs Bridgett Patterson5-7, 0-6
2021-05-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesLinda McArthur / Jen Wooden vs Donna Jones / Kathleen McCahey6-4, 6-2
2021-05-08Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLinda McArthur vs HEATHER HUGHES3-6, 2-6
2021-05-04vs TempleWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Wheat / Jodie Phillips vs Pamela Gowen / Sarah Speirs6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSabrina Alban / Deborah Dettmer vs Diane Carson / Sharon Edelstein7-6, 7-6
2021-04-28vs TempleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJodie Phillips / Meghan Meade vs Anne Monks / Pamela Gowen2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoanna Coffey / Linda McArthur vs Diane Carson / Susan Tipsord2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Lacey Gordon
published
3.50
Sabrina Alban
published
3.24
Melissa Truffer
published
3.13
Jodie Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Janine Kaganzev
published
3.02
Linda McArthur
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Deborah Dettmer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Sarah Kessler
published
2.97
Joanna Coffey
published
Mary Beth Herrera
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodie Phillips + Linda McArthur224 matchesnot enough data
Linda McArthur + Deborah Dettmer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lacey Gordon
7W–14L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.75
Sabrina Alban
19W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.50
Melissa Truffer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
3.24
3.5
Jodie Phillips
110W–116L career · 3 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Janine Kaganzev
2W–9L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Linda McArthur
73W–81L career · 6 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Deborah Dettmer
167W–205L career · 3 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00
Sarah Kessler
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
Joanna Coffey
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
2.97
Mary Beth Herrera
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.