1 MTC Mixed Miracles - Crews
2026 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0
10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA
Schedule10 played
i
Flight standings23 teams · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120 Raintree Earle - Sinsabaugh | 9 | 1 | 20 | 238 |
| 22 CCV FRAIZER | 8 | 2 | 18 | 223 |
| 323 CCV Baker | 8 | 2 | 21 | 228 |
| 417 ACAC Bader | 8 | 2 | 24 | 239 |
| 56 MAC Holley/McDorman 8.0 | 7 | 3 | 26 | 248 |
| 67 MAC Hammers 8.0 | 7 | 3 | 27 | 250 |
| 714 Westwood Wayland | 7 | 3 | 29 | 253 |
| 818 VCU Daniel | 6 | 3 | 34 | 262 |
| 921 SCC Moorhead | 6 | 4 | 29 | 259 |
| 1016 Burkwood- McKelvey | 6 | 4 | 33 | 270 |
| 1122 Burkwood Matthews | 5 | 5 | 28 | 243 |
| 129 Burkwood Kampinga | 5 | 5 | 38 | 294 |
| 1313 Willow Oaks Hale | 4 | 6 | 37 | 284 |
| 1412 Westwood-Coleman/Payne | 4 | 6 | 39 | 295 |
| 1519 Westwood Kings of Westwood | 3 | 6 | 33 | 254 |
| 165 MTC- Scammell | 3 | 7 | 37 | 291 |
| 173 MAC Return of the Huang | 3 | 7 | 41 | 291 |
| 1815 ACAC Kim | 3 | 7 | 42 | 308 |
| 1910 ACAC DELISIO | 3 | 7 | 44 | 314 |
| 204 Herm - Orski | 2 | 7 | 34 | 270 |
| 218 Courtside West 8.0 Mixed - Lobred | 2 | 7 | 37 | 261 |
| 221 MTC Mixed Miracles - Crews | 2 | 8 | 49 | 320 |
| 2311 ACAC~Lockhart | 2 | 8 | 52 | 349 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Greg Dean + Jennifer Shaffer | 6–3 | 55% games | +8.9% vs expected |
| Noelle Crews + Rob Williams | 4–4 | 50% games | not enough data |
| Tracy Marks + Noelle Crews | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Amanda Mayhew + Christopher Geoghegan | 0–3 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Jennifer Shaffer + Jimmy Biringer | 0–3 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.