Teams

PLEASANTON 18AM4.0A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

22 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-06-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesMukundan Swaminathan / Narayana Rao Surapaneni vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Vincenzo Rosano
published
4.06
Steven Lehmer
published
4.06
3.99
Hitendra Mishra
published 4.5
3.99
Vikram Kadi
published
3.84
Eugene Beyder
published 4
3.79
Dave McConnell
published 4
3.75
Ritesh Bhandari
published
3.71
David Wisser
published 4
3.68
Mike van Doorn
published
3.64
Prakash Durgani
published
3.64
Jeffrey Cannon
published
3.60
3.58
Samir Bhatnagar
published
3.57
Christopher Lau
published 4
3.52
Lokesh Raja
published
3.51
Vijaya Bhargava
published
3.46
Gabriel Ionita
published 4
3.44
Selvam Doraisamy
published
3.41
Pradeep Nair
published
3.13
Narayana Rao Surapaneni
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Thangavel Duraisamy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vincenzo Rosano
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
4.13
Steven Lehmer
25W–19L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Mukundan Swaminathan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
4.06
4.5
Hitendra Mishra
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
Vikram Kadi
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Eugene Beyder
21W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Dave McConnell
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
Ritesh Bhandari
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
David Wisser
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
Mike van Doorn
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Prakash Durgani
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
Jeffrey Cannon
19W–22L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
Pravin Kumaradhas Lalitha
1W–14L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Samir Bhatnagar
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Christopher Lau
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Lokesh Raja
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
3.52
Vijaya Bhargava
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Gabriel Ionita
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46
Selvam Doraisamy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.44
Pradeep Nair
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Narayana Rao Surapaneni
87W–76L career · 8 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.13
Thangavel Duraisamy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.