Teams

JTC - Schafer

2022 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-27vs ALACHUA - JTC - CribbWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Lear / Corey Sobers vs Ashok Kumar / Michael Herriott4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNewell Fox / Jungyun Hwang vs Rupen Shah / Roy Cribb7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-26vs ALACHUA - JTC - CribbSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEric Esterline / Jungyun Hwang vs Roy Cribb / Sorin Fratila6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNewell Fox / John Lear vs Tedd Comerford / Rupen Shah6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-21vs ALACHUA - JTC - CribbWon 21
W#1 DoublesEric Esterline / Newell Fox vs Roy Cribb / Rupen Shah6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChad Schafer / Jackson Songayab vs Brent Lira / Alejandro Pauly1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJosh Roberts / Jungyun Hwang vs Sorin Fratila / Michael Herriott6-4, 6-1
2022-05-18vs ALACHUA - JTC - CribbLost 02
L#1 DoublesJefferson Braswell / Jungyun Hwang vs Ashok Kumar / Roy Cribb4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNewell Fox / John Lear vs Tedd Comerford / Rupen Shah5-7
2022-05-12vs ALACHUA - JTC - CribbSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Lear / Josh Roberts vs Tedd Comerford / Rupen Shah3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEric Esterline / Jungyun Hwang vs Michael Herriott / Alejandro Pauly6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-10vs ALACHUA - JTC - CribbSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChad Schafer / John Lear vs Roy Cribb / Sorin Fratila7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJungyun Hwang vs Rupen Shah6-2, 6-1
2022-04-03vs ALACHUA - JTC - CribbLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Lear / Jungyun Hwang vs Rupen Shah / Roy Cribb2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Eric Esterline
published 4.5
3.88
Jungyun Hwang
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4
3.82
Juan Torres
published
3.81
Newell Fox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Corey Sobers
published 4
3.56
John Lear
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Chad Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Lear + Chad Schafer1544% gamesnot enough data
Chad Schafer + Jungyun Hwang3256% gamesnot enough data
Newell Fox + John Lear134 matchesnot enough data
John Lear + Jungyun Hwang134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Esterline
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Jungyun Hwang
128W–97L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
Juan Torres
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Newell Fox
55W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Corey Sobers
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
John Lear
66W–84L career · 6 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Chad Schafer
109W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.