Teams

Kikkert/Knoxville

2025 Adult 65 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Adult 65 & over Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-12vs Smead/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Sullivan / Eileen Webster vs Peggy Strand / Mary Vineyard5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Wentz / Angie Herzog vs Shirley Vaughan / Alma Swaney6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLuAnne Zelasko / Linda Viehmann vs Joy Benson / Ruth Jackson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-28vs Smead/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElize Kikkert / Mary Kathryn Cockrill vs Barbara Woods / Pamela Smead2-2
L#3 DoublesTeri Henry / Elaine Vandiver vs Shirley Vaughan / Alma Swaney2-6, 2-6
2025-06-14vs Carter-Ford/KnoxvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesCaroline Sullivan / Eileen Webster vs Mary Wilson / Tina Thompson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLuAnne Zelasko / Linda Viehmann vs Carolyn Hutsell / Donna Worrell7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTeri Henry / Nancy Tucker vs Susan West / Elaine Zeanah2-6, 3-6
2025-05-10vs Carter-Ford/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Teri Henry vs Sandy Hodson / Carolyn Hutsell6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElaine Vandiver / Eileen Webster vs Cammie Cate / Melinda Connell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Viehmann / Mary Kathryn Cockrill vs Susan West / Belinda Ford6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 65 & over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Angie Herzog
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Teri Henry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Eileen Webster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
LuAnne Zelasko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Elaine Vandiver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Linda Viehmann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Elize Kikkert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Mary Kathryn Cockrill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Vandiver + Linda Viehmann224 matchesnot enough data
Elaine Vandiver + Eileen Webster123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angie Herzog
19W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Teri Henry
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Eileen Webster
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
LuAnne Zelasko
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Elaine Vandiver
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Linda Viehmann
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Elize Kikkert
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
Mary Kathryn Cockrill
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.