Teams

HG GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-29vs CHCC GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gruidel / Betsy Agnvall vs Ashley Balakas / Laura Koelbel6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKees Henderson vs Allison Stassen1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKristin Linhardt / Shelley Reed vs Dana France / Jordan Mahoney6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesShannon Converse vs Amy Beth Schulz1-6, 2-6
2026-05-28vs HW GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesKees Henderson / Debbie Lepetsos vs Melissa Long / Kelly Lewis1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJena Greer vs Courtney Ricci4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesShelley Reed / Karen Miller vs Kristin Martini / Allison Sampson6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAdria Reed vs Katie Gelman3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Converse / Jennifer Gruidel vs Katie Dulik / Meredith Goss1-6, 1-6
2026-05-20vs LTFC ORANGELost 23
W#1 DoublesKaren Miller / Betsy Agnvall vs Betsy Berman / Heather Prier7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKees Henderson vs Sheryl Rose4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDebbie Lepetsos / Jennifer Gruidel vs Shelley Maloney / Christina Jordan2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSuzette Loving vs Amy DiOrio0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Davis / Kristin Linhardt vs Tracy Klein / Ellen Leher3-6, 5-7
2026-05-11vs FOX NAVYLost 05
L#1 DoublesBetsy Agnvall / Jennifer Gruidel vs Whitney Baylor / Bre Lichtenberg6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesSuzette Loving vs Melissa Gilkison6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKyle Davis / Karen Miller vs Jaime Martinez / Jennifer Lobb4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesShannon Converse vs Kathleen Glenn2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAdria Reed / Jena Greer vs Cheryl Jones / Lisa Licause2-6, 4-6
2026-04-27vs GCC TEALWon 21
L#1 DoublesKyle Davis / Kristin Linhardt vs Christine Viney / Monique Fox3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSuzette Loving vs Lori Marks-Connors6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKees Henderson / Shelley Reed vs Amanda Lee / Holly Song6-0, 6-0
2026-04-20vs SS-D BLUELost 23
W#1 DoublesShelley Reed / Debbie Lepetsos vs Nancy Railey-Borchelt / Traci Henry2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKees Henderson vs Deborah Miller6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKyle Davis / Kristin Linhardt vs Kelly Goodnough / Joyce Naylon3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesShannon Converse vs Karen Allaire0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Miller / Jena Greer vs Nancy Hogue / Jane Lundwall6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-18vs SS-H BLACKLost 23
W#1 DoublesBetsy Agnvall / Debbie Lepetsos vs Emily Amack / Kim White4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSuzette Loving vs Gina Caton4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesShelley Reed / Jennifer Gruidel vs Anne Kocur / Dina Clifford7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKees Henderson vs Marisa Benway6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesShannon Converse / Kyle Davis vs Sarah Bernauer / Anne Packer1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Kees Henderson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.79
Betsy Agnvall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Shelley Reed
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.73
Suzette Loving
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.72
Debbie Lepetsos
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Kristin Linhardt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Kyle Davis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.51
Jena Greer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.51
Shannon Converse
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.42
Adria Reed
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.42
Jennifer Gruidel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzette Loving + Debbie Lepetsos3450% games−0.4% vs expected
Kyle Davis + Kristin Linhardt4845% games−5.9% vs expected
Jennifer Gruidel + Debbie Lepetsos3253% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Lepetsos + Betsy Agnvall3250% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Gruidel + Betsy Agnvall123 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Reed + Debbie Lepetsos303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kees Henderson
6W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Betsy Agnvall
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Shelley Reed
11W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Suzette Loving
79W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Debbie Lepetsos
70W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Kristin Linhardt
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Kyle Davis
8W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Jena Greer
8W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
Shannon Converse
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Adria Reed
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Jennifer Gruidel
16W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.