Teams

Langley, CC, LFT, 3.0 (18&O) Womens Night

2023 LAF Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.0 LAF (18&O) Women Night

16 players · average NTRP 3.20 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 LAF (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Amanda McMath
published 3.5
3.05
Beth Dyson
published 3.5
2.98
Leah DesOrmeaux
published
2.96
Liz Webb Hebert
published
2.93
Elizabeth Langley
published
2.91
Denise Mosser
published 3
2.89
Jennifer Guidry
published
2.85
Maggie Stirling
published
2.82
Colleen Colby
published 3
2.62
Darla King
published 3
2.60
Sherry Elder
published
2.58
Michelle Ritter
published
Joan Dubuisson
published
Sarah Sonnier
published
Timi Wadleigh
published
Wendy Campbell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Webb Hebert + Beth Dyson3251% games+12.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda McMath
55W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Beth Dyson
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Leah DesOrmeaux
14W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
Liz Webb Hebert
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Elizabeth Langley
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Denise Mosser
10W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.91
Jennifer Guidry
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
2.89
Maggie Stirling
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Colleen Colby
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Darla King
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
Sherry Elder
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Michelle Ritter
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
Joan Dubuisson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Sonnier
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Timi Wadleigh
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Campbell
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.