Teams

Reuwer - Hunters

2025 Howard Adult 65 & Over · Howard Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-21vs DT Grabill 65+ 7.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesDonald Reuwer / Randall Scott vs Christopher Gaylor / James Turnage6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Trevor Croft vs Lyn Cutulle / Michael Hansberry3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-12vs SartwellLost 01
L#2 DoublesDean Dubbe / William Bloomquist vs Richard Anderson / Howard Staley1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Donald Reuwer vs Jacob Zylberberg / Ken Flower0-6, 0-6
2025-07-21vs DT Grabill 65+ 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesDean Dubbe / Donald Reuwer vs Vince Giuliana / Bill Kenney6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-30vs SartwellLost 01
L#1 DoublesDonald Reuwer / Jim Firestone vs Frederick Becker / Hemant Bhavsar1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Trevor Croft vs Cliff Bernstein / Ken Flower2-6, 2-6
2025-06-04vs DT Grabill 65+ 7.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDonald Reuwer / Thomas Price vs Daniel Mandl / Stephen Haines0-6, 1-6
2025-05-19vs SartwellLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Donald Reuwer vs Al Baker / Michael Litzau6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Bob Weickgenannt
published 4
3.29
Gerald Jones
published 3.5
3.28
Dean Dubbe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
William Bloomquist
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Donald Reuwer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jim Firestone
published
Randall Scott
published
Thomas Price
published
Trevor Croft
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donald Reuwer + Dean Dubbe1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bob Weickgenannt
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Gerald Jones
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Dean Dubbe
30W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
William Bloomquist
68W–81L career · 10 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Donald Reuwer
60W–121L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
Jim Firestone
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Randall Scott
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Price
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trevor Croft
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.