Teams

DTC RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-17vs SKY TEALWon 20
W#1 SinglesNancy Alterman vs Erika Sabatos5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaura Spangler / Rebecca Wulliman vs Kim Brummond / Vicki Devine6-3, 6-3
2025-07-10vs CP GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesSharon Kelly / Kristin Bokelman vs Alison Shaw / Alicia Jiron6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Allison Bookmyer vs Laura Maugel / Alex Graves6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Glazer / Migdalia Morillo Rettig vs Jessica Rae / Claire Joyce7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-07-03vs WP REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Sharon Kelly vs Bethany Sheldon / Suzette Emerson6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Bokelman / Rohini Gupta vs Alison Mizer / Sanda McMillan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHelene Grall-Johnson / Karen Polzin vs Sue Hickey / Deborah Alper3-6, 3-6
2025-06-26vs CACM REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Nancy Alterman vs Charlotte Gillespie / Tamra Nathan6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Allison Bookmyer vs Sarah Kopp / Tiffany Sandusky3-6, 4-6
2025-06-21vs CP GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Wendy Glazer vs Alicia Jiron / Laura Maugel6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Karen Polzin vs Andrea Woolley / Jessica Rae6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNatasha Gallaway / Kristin Bokelman vs Lena Ursten Hobbs / KERRY HANSON6-4, 6-4
2025-06-19vs WP-O ORANGELost 13
L#1 DoublesNancy Alterman / Wendy Glazer vs Sarah Fitzgerald / Kara Gwinn2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMaura Spangler vs Taylor Pardun6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllison Bookmyer / Helene Grall-Johnson vs Kelly Fitz / Mary Vivo0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Yoder / Rohini Gupta vs Reba Tsvetkova / Tammy Terhaar1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-12vs SKY TEALSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Karen Polzin vs Casey Hermansen / Jennifer Lester4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMaura Spangler vs Vicki Devine6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Bokelman / Natasha Gallaway vs Erika Sabatos / Kim Foster6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHelene Grall-Johnson / Deborah Yoder vs Jeffra Frank / Katherine Sullivan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Maura Spangler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Jody Hunnicutt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Sharon Kelly
published
3.34
Rohini Gupta
published
3.29
Kristin Bokelman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Allison Bookmyer
published 3.5
3.23
Rebecca Wulliman
published
3.22
Wendy Glazer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Natasha Gallaway
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Nancy Alterman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Helene Grall-Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Deborah Yoder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Polzin
published
Valeria Alberola
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maura Spangler + Rebecca Wulliman4455% games+3.7% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Sharon Kelly3253% games−0.4% vs expected
Kristin Bokelman + Natasha Gallaway291457% games−0.6% vs expected
Wendy Glazer + Nancy Alterman111047% games−1.2% vs expected
Deborah Yoder + Helene Grall-Johnson2638% gamesnot enough data
Jody Hunnicutt + Helene Grall-Johnson2350% gamesnot enough data
Jody Hunnicutt + Wendy Glazer224 matchesnot enough data
Jody Hunnicutt + Maura Spangler224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Maura Spangler
49W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Jody Hunnicutt
109W–80L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Sharon Kelly
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
Rohini Gupta
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Kristin Bokelman
87W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Migdalia Morillo Rettig
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Allison Bookmyer
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Wulliman
15W–25L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Wendy Glazer
79W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Natasha Gallaway
82W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Nancy Alterman
30W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Helene Grall-Johnson
31W–83L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.94
3
Deborah Yoder
37W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
Karen Polzin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Valeria Alberola
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.