Teams

Pin Oak - Hit Happens

2026 HTA Fall Friday Women's Doubles · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Sarah Deforke
published
3.40
Darya Shavandi
published 3.5
3.37
Jill Hodgeson
published
3.36
Blakely Dye
published 3.5
3.28
Joyce Hanlon
published
3.28
Angie Lindloff
published 3.5
3.26
Madelaine Blair
published
3.24
Cecilia Diaz
published 3.5
3.24
Leslie Delcampo
published
3.19
Shoyleen Hamilton
published
3.09
2.76
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Hodgeson + Angie Lindloff044 matchesnot enough data
Angie Lindloff + LaShonda Nacole Pentecost224 matchesnot enough data
Madelaine Blair + Joyce Hanlon044 matchesnot enough data
Shoyleen Hamilton + Joyce Hanlon033 matchesnot enough data
Angie Lindloff + Madelaine Blair123 matchesnot enough data
Blakely Dye + Cecilia Diaz123 matchesnot enough data
Cecilia Diaz + Catherine Dansdill213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Deforke
10W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Darya Shavandi
5W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jill Hodgeson
6W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Blakely Dye
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Joyce Hanlon
5W–19L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Angie Lindloff
15W–42L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Madelaine Blair
10W–33L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cecilia Diaz
19W–31L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Leslie Delcampo
17W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Shoyleen Hamilton
4W–18L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
LaShonda Nacole Pentecost
34W–49L career · no lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Catherine Dansdill
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.