Teams

CBrignac

2022 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-10-18vs Diamonds 7.5 comboLost 01
L#2 DoublesCharles Brignac / Greg Kasse vs Scott Riley / Vincent Conzola5-7, 1-6
2022-10-11vs AMcMillen55+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRay Goldberg / Charles Brignac vs John Pickard / James King4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesGary Sollenberger / David Swann vs Chip Payne / Peter Williams3-6, 2-6
2022-10-04vs JParhamLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeff Smith / Gary Sollenberger vs Ken Dehaven / John Wagner2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharles Brignac / RANDY PASSMAN vs John Parham / Jason Sage0-6, 0-6
2022-09-27vs RRubin/LeeLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharles Brignac / Ray Goldberg vs Kurt Ihly / Arthur Rubin1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGary Sollenberger / Jeff Smith vs Joe Butler / Edward Poyo6-7, 3-6
2022-09-20vs McNeillLost 01
L#1 DoublesRay Goldberg / Charles Brignac vs Joseph Smith / Chris Henrion1-6, 0-6
2022-09-13vs Diamonds 7.5 comboWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeff Smith / Gary Sollenberger vs Robert Chandler / Ken Lawton7-6, 6-4
2022-09-06vs AMcMillen55+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRay Goldberg / Charles Brignac vs Bob Brooks / Bart White3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-30vs JParhamLost 01
L#3 DoublesGary Sollenberger / Jeff Smith vs Wally Hinkleman / Wes Snead6-7, 4-6
2022-08-23vs RRubin/LeeSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRay Goldberg / Charles Brignac vs Joe Butler / Roger Hatlen5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Smith / Gary Sollenberger vs Joey Jacobs / Edward Poyo6-3, 6-2
2022-08-16vs McNeillLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Brignac / Greg Kasse vs Joseph Smith / Mark Zimmerman6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Ray Goldberg
published
3.40
David Swann
published 3.5
3.33
Greg Cox
published 3.5
3.19
RANDY PASSMAN
published
3.16
Charles Brignac
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.09
Gary Sollenberger
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
James Allen
published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Brignac + Gary Sollenberger212950% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ray Goldberg
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
David Swann
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Greg Cox
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
RANDY PASSMAN
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Charles Brignac
125W–136L career · 13 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Gary Sollenberger
65W–90L career · 9 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.09
0
James Allen
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.