Teams

BAY TREES PK 18AM4.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-15vs BLACKHAWK CC 18AM4.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesYuta Chen / Christopher Phan vs Federico Kalnicki / Matt Lourens6-2, 6-4
2023-05-24vs Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Phan / Yuta Chen vs Jonathan Maze / Keith Edwards7-6, 6-2
2023-05-07vs Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Phan / Yuta Chen vs Steven Lehmer / Neeraj Sharma6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
James Alliston
published
4.68
Yuta Chen
published 5
4.33
Doug Ditmer
published
4.24
Bang Nguyen
published 4.5
4.19
Sarang Kashyap
published
4.13
Teddy Handoko
published
4.11
Nachiketh Gutti
published
4.08
Christopher Phan
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
3.99
Jaewan Mun
published
3.98
Steve Berry
published
3.95
Jaime Santos
published
3.90
John Santos
published
3.90
TJ Schaefer
published
3.83
Wayne Leong
published
3.83
Issiah Cantrell
published
3.80
Steve Lhi
published
3.66
Walt Jefferson
published
Shane Swinnerton
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Alliston
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.76
5
Yuta Chen
57W–31L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.68
Doug Ditmer
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Bang Nguyen
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
4.24
Sarang Kashyap
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.19
Teddy Handoko
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.13
Nachiketh Gutti
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Christopher Phan
68W–42L career · 9 lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
4.08
Jaewan Mun
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.99
Steve Berry
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
Jaime Santos
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
John Santos
23W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.90
TJ Schaefer
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.90
Wayne Leong
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
Issiah Cantrell
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.83
Steve Lhi
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Walt Jefferson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.66
Shane Swinnerton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.