Teams

ICT Buchmeier 1:00pm

2025 Women's Daytime Doubles · 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Laura Stromgren
published
3.85
Emily Koenig
published
3.83
Cathy Paper
published 4
3.55
Hillary Olson
published
3.53
Virginia de la Riva
published
3.46
Sarah Tuel
published
3.39
Lynn Flagstad
published
3.36
Podaly Jay
published
3.35
Chris Parker
published 3.5
3.29
Kathleen Schik
published
3.26
Elizabeth Dolphin
published
3.19
Kathy Jungquist
published
3.09
Josephine Marcotty
published
3.04
Patricia Rhodus
published
Terri Yellowhammer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hillary Olson + Virginia de la Riva1936% games−14.8% vs expected
Patricia Rhodus + Lynn Flagstad044 matchesnot enough data
Emily Koenig + Hillary Olson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Stromgren
30W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Emily Koenig
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Cathy Paper
45W–35L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Hillary Olson
12W–22L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
Virginia de la Riva
9W–26L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Sarah Tuel
75W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Lynn Flagstad
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Podaly Jay
29W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Chris Parker
23W–29L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Kathleen Schik
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Elizabeth Dolphin
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Kathy Jungquist
8W–18L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Josephine Marcotty
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Patricia Rhodus
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Joyce Riestenberg-Smith
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri Yellowhammer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.