Teams

X40 7.0 LT2 Kara

2024 NEOTA Mixed 40 & Over · NEOTA 7.0 40&O Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-14vs X40 7.0 NC PaulinoLost 03
L#1 DoublesNEIL MCHALE / Elena McHale vs Michael Williams / Kimberly Williams4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteve Nutt / Carolyn Kara vs David Currier / Jeannette Cho3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael O'Connell / Donna Balc vs Molly White / Jason Kabbara2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-07vs X40 7.0 PM2 RappWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael O'Connell / Jessie Barr vs John Liebler / Lauren Thomas6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Mitnick / Elena McHale vs Christopher Lesher / Marcela Nicolae6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteve Nutt / Carolyn Kara vs Christopher Thomas / Victoria Sabino6-3, 6-2
2024-03-24vs X40 7.0 PM1 MeisenbachWon 21
W#1 DoublesNEIL MCHALE / Elena McHale vs Amalia Stoica / Sriram Krishnan6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichael O'Connell / Donna Balc vs Craig Warner / Toni Congeni6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Mitnick / Carolyn Kara vs John Consilio / Lisa Consilio6-1, 6-3
2024-03-10vs X40 7.0 LT1 GarstWon 21
W#1 DoublesVu Nguyen / Jessie Barr vs Jill Diamond / Steve Gehring6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNEIL MCHALE / Elena McHale vs Christa Galehouse / Rob Rericha6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Mitnick / Carolyn Kara vs Jeff Sterling / Jennifer Ruggles2-6, 4-6
2024-03-03vs X40 7.0 MV2 ConnellWon 21
L#1 DoublesNEIL MCHALE / Jessie Barr vs Michael Falcone / Kristin Chuko6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael O'Connell / Donna Balc vs Richard Kozich / Kate Bishop6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteve Nutt / Carolyn Kara vs Cyrus Bazljoo / Lynn Roth6-1, 6-3
2024-02-25vs OH NEO X40 7.0 BradyLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Mitnick / Carolyn Kara vs Liza Brady / Phong Nguyen4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Balc / Michael O'Connell vs Adam Atwell / Denise Hwang2-6, 2-6
2024-02-11vs X40 7.0 MV3 ZhangLost 03
L#1 DoublesVu Nguyen / Jessie Barr vs Hyundong Cho / Patricia Mercuri3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesScott KITZMILLER / Carolyn Kara vs GAUTAM PATHAK / Karen Cipriani5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSteve Nutt / Donna Balc vs Emily Szymanski / Denis Zaharija2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-02-04vs X40 7.0 BR TimkenWon 21
W#1 DoublesVu Nguyen / Jessie Barr vs Fred Zalenski / Kristin Zalenski6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSteve Nutt / Donna Balc vs J Britton Morrow / Francie Morrow1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Mitnick / Carolyn Kara vs David Tsai / Traci Tsai7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · NEOTA 7.0 40&O Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X40 7.0 MV3 Zhang7119514198
2OH NEO X40 7.0 Brady6215923203
3X40 7.0 LT1 Garst53131129219
4X40 7.0 LT2 Kara53101431229
5X40 7.0 MV2 Connell44131125214
6X40 7.0 NC Paulino4415926224
7X40 7.0 PM1 Meisenbach35121227233
8X40 7.0 BR Timken1771736243
9X40 7.0 PM2 Rapp1742041260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Paul Mitnick
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.40
Donna Balc
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.25
NEIL MCHALE
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Jessie Barr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Carolyn Kara
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Deborah McClure
published
Elena McHale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael O'Connell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Scott KITZMILLER
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Steve Nutt
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Kara + Paul Mitnick8551% games−0.5% vs expected
NEIL MCHALE + Elena McHale11166% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Kara + Steve Nutt2449% gamesnot enough data
Donna Balc + Michael O'Connell134 matchesnot enough data
Donna Balc + Paul Mitnick303 matchesnot enough data
NEIL MCHALE + Jessie Barr123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Mitnick
125W–102L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.70
Donna Balc
148W–97L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
NEIL MCHALE
63W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Jessie Barr
49W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Carolyn Kara
98W–70L career · 8 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
Deborah McClure
28W–23L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elena McHale
12W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael O'Connell
31W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott KITZMILLER
120W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Nutt
77W–74L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.