Teams

Chen

2021 DC Adult 55 & Over · WTA Adult 55 & Over Women 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-28vs En FunWon 10
W#3 DoublesMin Chen / Nancy Trimble vs Desiree Crawford / Patricia Brown3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-07vs ReasmyLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Trimble / Amy Horton vs Mazie Efinger / Lisa Steel3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-25vs ReasmyLost 01
L#3 DoublesJudy Lum / Nancy Trimble vs Mazie Efinger / Michie Dinger1-6, 0-6
2021-05-11vs En FunLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Pugh / Nancy Trimble vs De'Ana Dow / Karen Holmes3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WTA Adult 55 & Over Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Elizabeth Hunter
published 4
3.62
Elizabeth Pugh
published 3.5
3.33
Nancy Cooper
published
3.30
Julia Latein-Kimmig
published
3.17
Sandy Horowitz
published
3.02
Amy Horton
published 3.5
3.01
Esther Wang
published 3.5
2.97
Veronique Kessler
published
2.95
Nancy Trimble
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.74
Jennifer Hess
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Hunter
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Elizabeth Pugh
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%18%82%
3.62
Nancy Cooper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
Julia Latein-Kimmig
14W–19L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Sandy Horowitz
13W–20L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Amy Horton
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Esther Wang
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
Veronique Kessler
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Nancy Trimble
252W–415L career · 4 lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Donella Brockington
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
Jennifer Hess
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.