Teams

WAL KNOX

2026 FW USTA Winter Social 18+ Ladies - N · A

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-02-13vs RTC CURTISWon 20
W#1 DoublesHaylee Baumgartner / Breanna Clary vs Ruth WeinmannLopez / Bonnie Paquin6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoy Narciso / Kayla Margo vs Christine Quadlander / Gina Stewart6-4, 6-4
2026-02-06vs RTC CURTISWon 10
W#1 DoublesBreanna Clary / Joy Narciso vs Amelia Yeh / Priscila Vidal6-1, 7-5
2026-01-16vs RTC CURTISWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Knox / Shelby Kitchens vs Diana Kondratiuk / Katia Fischer6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAlyssa Rich vs Amelia Yeh6-4, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBreanna Clary / Haylee Baumgartner vs Ruth WeinmannLopez / Jana Stokes6-2, 6-4
2026-01-09vs RTC CURTISWon 30
W#1 DoublesBreanna Clary / Shelby Kitchens vs Bonnie Paquin / Molly Pruner7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMallory McCurdy vs Katia Fischer6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSpring McCurdy / Karla Woody vs Gina Stewart / Priscila Vidal6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Mallory McCurdy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.78
Miller McCurdy
published
3.77
Breanna Clary
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Karla Woody
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Kelly Knox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Kayla Margo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Shelby Kitchens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Joy Narciso
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Spring McCurdy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Chris Hurt
published 4
3.34
Alyssa Rich
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Haylee Baumgartner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Knox + Shelby Kitchens71047% games−5.7% vs expected
Chris Hurt + Kayla Margo0735% games−17.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mallory McCurdy
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Miller McCurdy
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Breanna Clary
19W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Karla Woody
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Kelly Knox
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
Kayla Margo
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Shelby Kitchens
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Joy Narciso
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
Spring McCurdy
7W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
4
Chris Hurt
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Alyssa Rich
7W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Haylee Baumgartner
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.