Teams

CMiller (Charlotte CC)

2026 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-24vs MWalters (Carmel)Lost 05
L#1 DoublesKathryn Pearson / Teale Long vs Meghan Walters / Robyn Hayward7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEmily Oakford vs Kristin Thompson0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Miller / Tara Cawthorne vs Sara Porrata / Errin Jensen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLanny Gillespie vs Jennifer Hutson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPage Gatewood / Lindsay Mathews vs Kelly Lilly / Megan Francis5-7, 3-6
2026-04-17vs CMcKiernan (Raintree)Won 40
W#1 DoublesKathryn Pearson / Taylor Russ vs Meagan Dorst / Ciara McKiernan6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTara Cawthorne / Lanny Gillespie vs Lora Marks / Elizabeth Harvey6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesHaley Cheek vs Tricia Shaw6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaige Johnson / Tracey Cook vs Jenny Carlson / Margot Bizon6-2, 6-2
2026-04-10vs VWade (Springfield)Won 31
L#1 DoublesTaylor Russ / Tara Cawthorne vs Mary Stewart Chatman / Maureen Paterson3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLanny Gillespie / Haley Cheek vs Julie Swanson / Christy ACEVEDO6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesHillary Crittendon vs Volree Wade6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLindsay Mathews / Tracey Cook vs Erica Turkus / Kara Ward6-2, 7-6
2026-03-31vs AYonchak (Myers Park)Won 31
W#1 SinglesKathryn Pearson vs Sally Hogan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Miller / Taylor Russ vs Regina Farmer / Stefanie Mitchell6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTeale Long vs Pender Hollmeyer6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLanny Gillespie / Page Gatewood vs Adele Yonchak / Kristi Speckman6-7, 1-6
2026-03-27vs KO’Shea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)Won 31
W#1 DoublesHillary Crittendon / Teale Long vs Kathryn Klaus / Katie O'Shea7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTaylor Russ / Tara Cawthorne vs Kara Olsen / Rebecca Fitzsimons7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLindsay Mathews vs Shelby Stahl4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPage Gatewood / Paige Johnson vs Jessica Babinski / Ginny Warlick6-4, 6-4
2026-03-20vs ASalette/PNussman (PPRSC)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTara Cawthorne / Kathryn Pearson vs Alyssa Salette / Alexis Self6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAlexandra Mann vs Annie Christie3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLanny Gillespie / Catherine Miller vs Dani Phillips / Michelle Jegier6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-13vs CAckels (Providence CC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHaley Cheek / Emily Oakford vs Ashley Hall / Anna Troppmann1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLanny Gillespie / Lindsay Mathews vs Karen Claffey / Kate Schumacher3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPage Gatewood / Tracey Cook vs Carla Ackels / Ashley Sofsian0-6, 3-6
2026-03-06vs KGreathouse (Russell)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Mann / Taylor Russ vs Memory Ayers / Bernice Cutler6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEmily Oakford vs Miranda Berkovich3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Miller / Hillary Crittendon vs Isabel Bader / Christie Hansen6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLanny Gillespie vs Kimberly Daise2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTracey Cook / Lindsay Mathews vs Shannon Grant / Elizabeth Murphy6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Teale Long
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.52
Kathryn Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.32
Hillary Crittendon
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.24
Tara Cawthorne
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Alexandra Mann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Tracey Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Emily Oakford
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Page Gatewood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Taylor Russ
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Lindsay Mathews
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.90
Lanny Gillespie
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.80
Haley Cheek
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teale Long
10W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.65
Kathryn Pearson
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Hillary Crittendon
16W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Tara Cawthorne
4W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Alexandra Mann
1W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Tracey Cook
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Emily Oakford
4W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Page Gatewood
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
Taylor Russ
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Lindsay Mathews
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
Lanny Gillespie
5W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.90
3
Haley Cheek
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.