Teams

11 Hermitage Sadusky-Politowicz 4.0

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-13vs 10 ACAC Hollomon 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMac Stuckey / Todd Furbee vs Michael Blackburn / Paul Davis6-1, 6-0
2025-05-15vs 9 Westwood - DiBlasi 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesRyan Politowicz / Todd Furbee vs Jackson Dyer / Yancey Jones6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesTodd Furbee / Ryan Politowicz vs Bret McFee / Adam Decker6-7, 3-6
2025-05-01vs 14 Willow Oaks CC - Dunton 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesTodd Furbee / Ryan Politowicz vs Anthony Cargill / Greg Deeb6-4, 6-4
2025-04-24vs 12 MTC Fuster 4.0Won 32
W#1 DoublesBart Nasta / Ryan Politowicz vs Sam Kang / John Kim6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesYOUNG CHOE vs Christopher Quirk7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Kelly / Braxton Fagan vs Jeffrey Johnson / Benjamin Andrews6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesWilliam Wise vs Christopher Geoghegan0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBryan Fisher / Mac Stuckey vs Roger Wisor / Michael Steele6-3, 6-2
2025-04-17vs 8 SCC Means 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesRyan Politowicz / Todd Furbee vs David Scheetz / Colin Blair6-3, 6-4
2025-04-10vs 3 Woodlake Kroos 4.0Lost 14
L#1 DoublesRyan Politowicz / Kurt Williams vs Wieslaw Gumulak / Ken Patterson3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPaul Kelly vs Derek Nelson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBraxton Fagan / Steve Hamant vs Timothy Wade / Edward Moss6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRyan Pelais vs Patrick Urban2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDaniel Sadusky / YOUNG CHOE vs Samuel Mauldin / James Kroos6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Todd Furbee
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.87
Mac Stuckey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Braxton Fagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Ryan Politowicz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Bryan Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
John Reifsnider
published
3.65
Bart Nasta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Steve Hamant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Daniel Sadusky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Kurt Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
William Wise
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.08
YOUNG CHOE
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Paul Kelly
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ryan Pelais
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Wood Gyory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mac Stuckey + Bryan Fisher8160% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Todd Furbee
72W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Mac Stuckey
14W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Braxton Fagan
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Politowicz
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Bryan Fisher
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
John Reifsnider
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Bart Nasta
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Steve Hamant
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Daniel Sadusky
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Kurt Williams
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
William Wise
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
YOUNG CHOE
3W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Paul Kelly
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Pelais
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Wood Gyory
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.