Teams

Duval/Rudolph

2025 Duval Combo 50 & Over Summer · 8.5 M Weds Eve

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-17vs Baymeadows DevosLost 01
L#2 DoublesGerald Henline / Dale Bennett vs David Smyth / Eugene Kasper3-6, 6-7
2025-08-27vs Baymeadows DevosLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Jenkins / Thomas Prouty vs Eric Leach / David Smyth2-6, 3-6
2025-08-20vs Marsh Landing HainesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris King / Dale Bennett vs Billy Burgess / Marcus Hodges6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDavid Jenkins / Thomas Prouty vs Scott Haines / Matt Sylvester4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-20vs Marsh Landing HainesWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris King / Dale Bennett vs Billy Burgess / Marcus Hodges6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Breag / Thomas Prouty vs Darin Pobst / Matt Sylvester6-2, 6-1
2025-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesChris King / Dale Bennett vs David Prichard / David Smyth6-0, 6-3
2025-07-30vs Marsh Landing HainesLost 01
L#2 DoublesDale Bennett / Chris King vs Josh Ezring - * / Matt Braun7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-16vs Baymeadows DevosLost 01
L#2 DoublesGerald Henline / Dale Bennett vs Eugene Kasper / Kenneth Wood7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 M Weds Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Daniel Breag
published 5
Chris King
published 4.5
4.25
David Jenkins
published 4.5
4.08
Mark Freyman
published
3.92
Dale Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.90
Scott Suhrer
published
3.84
Thomas Keller
published
3.82
Thomas Prouty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Peter Snell
published
Gerald Henline
published
Keven Fitzgerald
published
Richard Rudolph
published
Wilson Tennille
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dale Bennett + Gerald Henline224 matchesnot enough data
Gerald Henline + Mark Freyman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Daniel Breag
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.30
4.5
Chris King
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
David Jenkins
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
Mark Freyman
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.08
4
Dale Bennett
22W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
Scott Suhrer
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
Thomas Keller
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
Thomas Prouty
90W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Peter Snell
115W–56L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Gerald Henline
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Keven Fitzgerald
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Rudolph
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wilson Tennille
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.