Teams

Ossman/Nashville

2024 Tri-Level 55 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Saturday 9:00 am

17 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Saturday 9:00 am have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Kathleen Carbonari
published
3.82
Cindy Mccullough
published 4
Brenda Ossman
published 4
3.73
Rhonda Petrin
published
3.66
Maura Fitzgerald
published
3.55
Jan Phanthalangsy
published
3.50
Donna Demouy
published
3.46
Linda Payne
published
3.38
Thalia Kahl
published
3.37
Laurie Passmore
published
3.36
Jacqueline King
published
3.31
Sandra Rudd
published
3.30
Marian Vangeli
published
3.18
Joy Helton
published
2.69
Kate Elasy
published
2.62
Beth Stromatt
published 3
Patricia Eudaley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Mccullough + Kathleen Carbonari19364% games+5.4% vs expected
Rhonda Petrin + Donna Demouy2350% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Mccullough + Rhonda Petrin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Carbonari
54W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Cindy Mccullough
39W–31L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rhonda Petrin
20W–19L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Maura Fitzgerald
17W–14L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Jan Phanthalangsy
17W–28L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
Donna Demouy
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
Linda Payne
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.46
Thalia Kahl
22W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Laurie Passmore
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.37
Jacqueline King
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Sandra Rudd
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Marian Vangeli
19W–30L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
Joy Helton
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kate Elasy
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Beth Stromatt
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
Patricia Eudaley
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.